Are non-doctor Glenn Hagele's CRSQA/USAEyes 'certified' LASIK Surgeons Hazardous to your Health?

#11 01-22-2007, 01:25 AM

Eye wrote:
- quote -

> Victims are patients who have had corneal refractive surgery without
> fully informed consent from their surgeon. I guess that's just about
> all patients who have had corneal refractive surgery. This (failure to
> provide fully informed consent) is called malpractice in every state.

Bad guess stupid. Everyone is provided with informed consent.

#10 01-21-2007, 04:27 PM

Victims are patients who have had corneal refractive surgery without
fully informed consent from their surgeon. I guess that's just about
all patients who have had corneal refractive surgery. This (failure to
provide fully informed consent) is called malpractice in every state.

#9 01-21-2007, 01:24 AM

capnspalding8[at]yahoo.com wrote:
- quote -

> I thought only jerry springer could find people of this level of
> intelligence but here they are,Beevis and Butthead. Keep on slamming
> those victims,you bad little boys.

Victims? You have no clue as to what a victim is. You have the whining
thing down pat though.

#8 01-20-2007, 11:24 AM

I thought only jerry springer could find people of this level of
intelligence but here they are,Beevis and Butthead. Keep on slamming
those victims,you bad little boys.

#7 01-16-2007, 01:23 AM

#6 01-16-2007, 01:20 AM

spam = please read!

#5 01-16-2007, 01:00 AM

Eye wrote:
- quote -

> > capnspalding8[at]yahoo.com wrote:
> > > Anyone using lies and deceit to downplay risks to encourage one to risk
> > > their precious eyes for their own monetary gain is of course,a huge
> > > problem that must be resolved.
> So true.

in the flappie universe only.

#4 01-15-2007, 11:56 PM

- quote -

> capnspalding8[at]yahoo.com wrote:
> > Anyone using lies and deceit to downplay risks to encourage one to risk
> > their precious eyes for their own monetary gain is of course,a huge
> > problem that must be resolved.

So true.

#3 01-15-2007, 12:25 AM

capnspalding8[at]yahoo.com wrote:
- quote -

> Anyone using lies and deceit to downplay risks to encourage one to risk
> their precious eyes for their own monetary gain is of course,a huge
> problem that must be resolved.
> I believe some have already been sued for the false advertizing.
> Some of my own personal complications weren't even mentioned on consent
> forms until recently.
> As I travel from doctor to doctor trieing to find some sort of contact
> lens that may not exist until the future possibly,I do a lot of
> talking,and a lot of listening. The huge eye care facility I am now at
> is working hard to try and fit complication patients with something to
> correct their visual function. It isn't easy and some they cannot help
> because of intolerance to contacts etc.
> They told me of one man who was disabled for 4 years before they could
> finally get him in a condition where he could return to work.The
> manufacturer of my latest lenses (coming soon)also mentioned this story
> among others.
> I would like to continue but am typeing with my worst eye closed but
> the important thing is....DON'T LET THEM DO THIS TO YOUR ONE AND ONLY
> EYES,DON"T BE A FOOL LIKE I WAS.

Since you're not happy, no one else should. Maybe you're right, "don't
be a fool".

#2 01-14-2007, 11:54 AM

Anyone using lies and deceit to downplay risks to encourage one to risk
their precious eyes for their own monetary gain is of course,a huge
problem that must be resolved.
I believe some have already been sued for the false advertizing.
Some of my own personal complications weren't even mentioned on consent
forms until recently.
As I travel from doctor to doctor trieing to find some sort of contact
lens that may not exist until the future possibly,I do a lot of
talking,and a lot of listening. The huge eye care facility I am now at
is working hard to try and fit complication patients with something to
correct their visual function. It isn't easy and some they cannot help
because of intolerance to contacts etc.
They told me of one man who was disabled for 4 years before they could
finally get him in a condition where he could return to work.The
manufacturer of my latest lenses (coming soon)also mentioned this story
among others.
I would like to continue but am typeing with my worst eye closed but
the important thing is....DON'T LET THEM DO THIS TO YOUR ONE AND ONLY
EYES,DON"T BE A FOOL LIKE I WAS.

Similar Threads
Thread	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Dr. Peyton Neatrour Sued for Malpractice - $1.65 MM - "certified" by Glenn Hagele of USAEYES / CRSQA brent@brenthanson.com: VIRGINIA BEACH - A local eye surgeon has been sued by a former patient who say s her vision was made worse by a mishandled procedure performed...	Lasik Eye Surgery	21	09-13-2006 07:40 PM
USAEYES - Lasik Surgeons Certified by Glenn Hagele Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com: Learn why you should avoid having LASIK with USAEYES / CRSQA surgeons who have been certified by Glenn Hagele http://www.lasikflap.com/crsqa/...	Lasik Eye Surgery	5	07-27-2006 07:16 AM
The information Glenn Hagele posts may be hazardous to your eye health! Sandy - LASIKdisaster.com - LASIKmemorial.com: Glenn - USAEyes.org wrote: > About 50 years of study and millions of patients has determined that > if at least 250 microns of corneal tissue...	Lasik Eye Surgery	18	01-18-2005 03:33 PM
CRSQA Surgeons May be Hazardous to Your Health Glenn Hagele - Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance: Any surgeon and any surgery may be hazardous to your health. What one can do is attempt to put the odds on the side of a good outcome by becoming...	Lasik Eye Surgery	1	12-01-2003 07:27 AM

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode