> IF GLENN HAGELE CAN NOT PROVE THAT THE FBI CAME OVER TO SPEAK TO ME,
> WHICH WE ALL KNOW WOULD BE ALL OVER THE INTERNET BY NOW, THEN WHERE IS
> THE PROOF? LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES, FURTHER VALIDATING WHAT TYPE OF
> INDIVIDUAL GLENN HAGLE IS.

> On Apr 24, 8:54 am, Glenn - USAEyes.org
> <glenn.hageleSTOPS...[at]USAEyes.org> wrote:
> > So, Dean Andrew Kantis, are you denying that the FBI questioned you?
> IF GLENN HAGELE CAN NOT PROVE THAT THE FBI CAME OVER TO SPEAK TO ME,
> WHICH WE ALL KNOW WOULD BE ALL OVER THE INTERNET BY NOW, THEN WHERE IS
> THE PROOF? LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES, FURTHER VALIDATING WHAT TYPE OF
> INDIVIDUAL GLENN HAGLE IS.
> HE CERTAINLY IS FAR FROM A "PATIENT ADVOCATE" AS HE DREAMS TO
> BE...HAVE THE CRSQA DOCTORS FIGURED OUT YET THAT THEY ARE PAYING GLENN
> HAGELE $5,000 FOR A BOGUS CERTIFICATION TO RUIN THEIR REPUTATION?
> PROBABLY NOT...WAY TO GO GLENN!! YOU AND YOU ALONE ARE RUINING THE
> LASIK INDUSTRY AND MAKING IT WORSE FOR ALL THAT YOU REPRESENT BIG
> SHOT!!
> WWW.LASIKFLAP.COM
> GLENN HAGELE'S WELL EARNED ILL-HEARTED REPUTATION
> WWW.USAEYES.INFO
> GLENN HAGELE'S WELL EARNED ILL-HEARTED REPUTATION
> WWW.LIFEAFTERLASIK.COM
> GLENN HAGELE'S WELL EARNED ILL-HEARTED REPUTATION
> CRSQA DOCTORS:
> I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO READ THE BELOW...YOU SHOULD BE INFORMED
> OF WHAT YOUR LEADER, GLENN HAGELE, IS SAYING AND DOING TO HURT
> LASIK PATIENTS, BECAUSE YOU ARE PAYING HIM...AND HE SEEMS TO APPEAR
> TO BE CREATING AND ANSWERING HUNDREDS IF NOT THOUSANDS OF NEGATIVE
> BLOGS REGARDING LASIK, AND HE HAS BEEN FOUND TO CONTINUALLY HARASS
> HURT LASIK PATIENTS...
> WHAT DOES THIS MEAN TO YOU? IT IS MAKING YOU LOOK BAD AND HE COULD BE
> RUINING EACH OF YOUR REPUTATIONS...IF YOU ARE ONE OF THE BELOW, YOU
> MAY
> WANT TO HAVE A 'HEART TO HEART' TALK WITH GLENN HAGELE:
> ARE THESE THE 'INFAMOUS CRSQA DOCTORS'????
> IF SO, HAVE THESE GUYS EVEN FIGURED OUT YET THAT WHAT IS HAPPENING TO
> THEIR REPUTATION THANKS TO GLENN HAGELE AND USAYES?
> Lasik Doctor Kerry Assil
> Lasik Doctor Jay Bansal
> Lasik Doctor Daniel Beers
> Lasik Doctor Scott Behler
> Lasik DoctorLeft CRSQA/USA eyes
> Lasik Doctor Robert Brems
> Lasik Doctor Stephen Brint
> Lasik Doctor Ronald Brown
> Lasik Doctor Randy Burks
> Lasik Doctor Andrew Caster
> Lasik Doctor Benjamin Chang
> Lasik DoctorDavid Dulaney
> Lasik Doctor Daniel Durrie
> Lasik Doctor Ella Faktorovich
> Lasik DoctorRaymond Gailitis
> Lasik Doctor Robert Gladsden
> Lasik Doctor Daniel Goldberg
> Lasik Doctor Jack T Holladay
> Lasik Doctor Thierry Hufhagel
> Lasik Doctor Kent Kirk (isn't this guy the one on the video telling
> how great the statistics were about Alcon, i think many people lost a
> lot of credibility for this guy, as in our opinions...he seemed to be
> lying through his eyes)
> Lasik Doctor Lasik Doctor Robert Lin
> Lasik Doctor Richard Lindstrom
> Lasik Doctor Robert Maloney (isn't this the guy that just did lasik on
> Kristen from Laguna Beach, who is like 20 years old...can you believe
> a doctor would do that for publicity??? she's a kid, and who can say
> if her eyes are stable and he just did lasik on her for probably
> what...exposure??...very sick, two words: DEEPLY DISTURBING!!)
> Lasik Doctor James McDonald
> Lasik Doctor Michael Mockovak
> Lasik Doctor Sanford Moretsky
> Lasik Doctor Thomas Planchard
> Lasik Doctor Philip Roholt
> Lasik Doctor James Rynerson
> Lasik Doctor Cary M Silverman
> Lasik Doctor Swati Singh
> Lasik Doctor Barrie Soloway
> Lasik Doctor Gregory Stainer
> Lasik Doctor Harmon Stein
> Lasik Doctor Steven Stetson
> Lasik DoctorDan Tran
> Lasik Doctor Mark Volpicelli
> Lasik Doctor David A Wallace
> Lasik Doctor Robert Weisenthal
> Lasik Doctor Marc Werner
> Lasik Doctor Norman Zaffater
> MORE ON THESE DOCTORS AND THEIR REPUTATIONS FROM HURT PATIENTS CAN BE
> FOUND AT:
> WWW.LASIKFLAP.COM
> WWW.USAEYES.INFO
> WWW.LIFEAFTERLASIK.COM
> "BE VERY CAREFUL OF GLENN HAGELE AND IN GOING TO ANY CRSQA LASIK
> DOCTOR..."

> So, Dean Andrew Kantis, are you denying that the FBI questioned you?

> On Apr 29, 8:13?pm, spammer <sereb...[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 29, 11:05 pm, LASIK Nightmare <badla...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Are you naive or just stupid? They clog the courts all the time with
> > > > frivilous suits. The one win covers a lot of losses. They "spend" next
> > > > to nothing filing and following. Just because you hear of huge legal
> > > > bills, it doesn't mean it cost the lawyer.
> > > When a med-mal lawyer takes a case on contingency and loses, who do
> > > you think eats the cost?
> > What cost? Can't you read? It costs them sooooooooo much less than
> > they bill. You can't go by what they bill, it's a ZILLION times their
> > cost.
> To whom will they send that bill?

> On Apr 29, 11:05 pm, LASIK Nightmare <badla...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Are you naive or just stupid? They clog the courts all the time with
> > > frivilous suits. The one win covers a lot of losses. They "spend" next
> > > to nothing filing and following. Just because you hear of huge legal
> > > bills, it doesn't mean it cost the lawyer.
> > When a med-mal lawyer takes a case on contingency and loses, who do
> > you think eats the cost?
> * What cost? Can't you read? *It costs them sooooooooo much less than
> they bill. You can't go by what they bill, it's a ZILLION times their
> cost.

> > Are you naive or just stupid? They clog the courts all the time with
> > frivilous suits. The one win covers a lot of losses. They "spend" next
> > to nothing filing and following. Just because you hear of huge legal
> > bills, it doesn't mean it cost the lawyer.
> When a med-mal lawyer takes a case on contingency and loses, who do
> you think eats the cost?

> On Apr 29, 9:47 pm, LASIK Nightmare <badla...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
> > How many attorneys do you know who take "ridiculous" or "frivolous"
> > cases? *Why would they commit professional suicide doing so? *Their
> > records of wins and losses follow them. *Why would they take a med-mal
> > case on contingency and spend thousands (or tens of thousands or more)
> > if they don't believe that a case has merit and that they can win it?
> > Think about it.
> Are you naive or just stupid? They clog the courts all the time with
> frivilous suits. The one win covers a lot of losses. They "spend" next
> to nothing filing and following. Just because you hear of huge legal
> bills, it doesn't mean it cost the lawyer.