|
#167
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 27, 10:27 pm, Todd Rich <t...[at]panix.com> wrote: - quote - > R Brown <rrrssstttu...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > Contact information to report Glenn Hagele to the California Attorney > > General: > > http://ag.ca.gov/contact/index.php > Wow Burch, you are really running scared..... Not running scared, running psycho. |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#166
| |||
| |||
| R Brown <rrrssstttuuu8[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Contact information to report Glenn Hagele to the California Attorney
Wow Burch, you are really running scared.....> General: > http://ag.ca.gov/contact/index.php |
|
#165
| |||
| |||
| Too many flappies spewing crap. |
|
#164
| |||
| |||
| Here's the address and phone number of the Office of Privacy Protection in Sacramento. http://www.privacyprotection.ca.gov/contact.htm 1625 North Market Blvd., Suite N324, Sacramento, CA 95834 (Toll Free) (866) 785-9663 Direct (916) 574-8180 If Glenn Hagele is publishing your personal private information on his LASIK patient hate site, please report him immediately. |
|
#163
| |||
| |||
| Contact information to report Glenn Hagele to the California Attorney General: http://ag.ca.gov/contact/index.php |
|
#162
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 27, 6:21 pm, Glenn - USAEyes.org <glenn.hageleSTOPS...[at]USAEyes.org> wrote: - quote - > I spent several days this week meeting with lawmakers who support
Glenn Hagele Threatens to Publish Social Security Numbers of LASIK> changes that will clarify and strengthen applicable law regarding the > unauthorized publicizing of another person's private identity on the > Internet and by any other means. I have been working with staff of the > Attorney General, who has agreed to move against the perpetrator(s) in > my case. > The malicious publicizing of personal identity information, including > Social Security number is an important issue that affects everyone. patients: http://usaeyes.info/glenn-hagele/gle...-patients.html The cyber-assassin Glenn Hagele is currently publishing injured LASIK patients' personal information on his patient hate site. I suggest these injured LASIK patients contact the Attorney General of California and report him for maliciously exposing injured LASIK patients to identity theft. |
|
#161
| |||
| |||
| What's really phony about Glenn's Hagele's little 'newswire' is that Brent Hanson was the one who published the material containing Glenn Hagele's social security number, and Glenn Hagele knows it. Glenn is about to lose a case he filed over this matter, because it is legal to publish publicly available documents. If Glenn Hagele had kept his nose clean, all of those embarrassing documents displaying his social security number would not have been available to the general public. They are out there in the public domain. The documents probably would have rested quietly in an obscure corner of a courhouse had Glenn Hagele not taken it upon himself to harrass patients whose vision was damaged by corneal refractive surgery. Glenn is now advertising the fact that his social security number is out there HIMSELF! Perhaps he should be more concerned about the content of the documents displaying his SSN. Now THOSE are some embarrassing court documents! How can Glenn expect anyone to take him seriously when court documents outlining his problems with the IRS, failure to pay child support, tax liens on his house (CRSQA headquarters) and bankruptcy are in the public domain. Sorry Glenn... when you start stiffing your creditors and breaking laws you lose some of your privacy. |
|
#160
| |||
| |||
| The website is operating correctly. The location of the publication of my personal identity is not included in any public information release. I spent several days this week meeting with lawmakers who support changes that will clarify and strengthen applicable law regarding the unauthorized publicizing of another person's private identity on the Internet and by any other means. I have been working with staff of the Attorney General, who has agreed to move against the perpetrator(s) in my case. The malicious publicizing of personal identity information, including Social Security number is an important issue that affects everyone. Glenn Hagele Executive Director USAEyes.org Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification "Consider and Choose With Confidence" Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org http://www.USAEyes.org Lasik Bulletin Board http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/ I am not a doctor. Copyright 2007 All Rights Reserved |
|
#159
| |||
| |||
| I just saw this posted on PR Newswire. "Newswire" is a bit of a misnomer. PR is the operative term. This looks like a journal article, but was most likely written by Glenn himself and at the very least was sent to the website by him probably paid for with CRSQA funds. Glenn, I don't understand why you are publicizing this so much. Aren't you afraid of more retaliation and/or identity theft? Is your goal to somehow publicly humiliate Nell Burch or are you interested in increasing identity security on the web. To whom is this press release directed? Who do you imagine your audience to be? http://sev.prnewswire.com/high-tech-...723042007-1.ht ml CyberAssassination: Social Security Numbers Publicized on Critics' Websites Public records with personal information vulnerable; lack of adequate enforcement CyberAssassination: Social Security Numbers Publicized on Critics' Websites RALEIGH, N.C., Apr 23 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Internet bloggers maliciously publicizing personal identity information including the victim's Social Security number is emerging as a major identity theft problem, and the information is often culled from online public records. From her Durham, N.C. home Lauranell "Nell" Burch publishes a website where she and others offer complaints about Lasik, the popular laser eye surgery. Recently Burch's website began showing the personal and financial information of Glenn Hagele, director of the Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance (USAEyes.org). "This is a CyberAssassination; an Internet hit job," complains Glenn Hagele, who founded the nonprofit USAEyes.org in 1997. "I've had my Social Security number, bank account numbers, credit card numbers, and even samples of my signature publicized." Burch attained Hagele's identity from public records and court documents that had not redacted his private information. For decades the practical obscurity of documents buried in government archives kept abuse to a minimum. Public documents including lawsuits, divorce, bankruptcy, child support, and even traffic violations may contain sensitive information. The recent availability of public records over the Internet has renewed the controversy between the public's right to know and an individual's right to privacy. The line is further blurred by the subtle difference between just obtaining a public document and publicizing it to millions over the Internet, exposing the victim to identity theft. "What's bizarre is that we had nothing to do with Ms. Burch or her Lasik," says Hagele. "She did not seek our advice and did not use a Lasik doctor affiliated with our organization." Hagele's concern extends beyond his own financial identity. "Any advocate, anyone who voices an opinion, any blogger, any identifiable group can become the target of this kind of CyberAssassination. I deal with laser eye surgery and I've been targeted. How safe is someone who raises a major controversy?" Internet publication of personal identity data has become so problematic that Google, the world's most popular Internet search engine according to a 2006 Advertising Age analysis, has dedicated a web page for victims to report incidents. A Software & Information Industry Association analysis identified service institutions, especially Internet-based service institutions such as USAEyes.org, as especially at risk. Hagele contacted authorities seeking help in blocking access to his identity information only to find them unable or hesitant to act. "Legislation has not caught up with the Internet," says Hagele. A patchwork of local, state, and national laws are often unclear. Identity theft has topped the list of consumer complaints to the US Federal Trade Commission for the last seven consecutive years, constituting 36% of all FTC complaints in 2006. Hagele is meeting with lawmakers, urging them to clarify and strengthen privacy law. Website: http://www.usaeyes.org/ Website: http://www.glennhagele.com/identity Trying to click through to usaeyes. org comes up with the following message: Forbidden You don't have permission to access / on this server. Are the websites offline? -- ~RT |
| Tags |
| crsqa, offline |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| CRSQA surgeons, what does CRSQA affiliation REALLY do for you - a TEST southeasteyecare@hotmail.com: Attention refractive surgeons who are CRSQA certified: Does your CRSQA/USAEyes.org affiliation reflect well on your refractive surgery practice?... | Lasik Eye Surgery | 6 | 09-15-2006 02:52 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |