|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Robert wrote: - quote - > What do all y'all think of Transitions lenses - useful addition, or should
I bought some (plastic) maybe 4 years ago. Worthless. Not enough UV in the> Otis push them along with his plus lenses? car to make them turn, and driving is what I really wanted them for. I should have demanded my money back because nobody warmed me, but I didn't. I had glass photogray lenses for a long time and was very happy with them. Perhaps the plastic ones are better now. -- Cheers, Bev ------------------- Don't you just KNOW that there is more than one Sierra Club member who is absolutely sure that the dinosaurs died out because of something humans did? |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "Mike Tyner" <mtyner[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > My kids avoided nearsightedness. I believe it was the totem I placed in our
Ah, they must have used it agressively, and at the threshhold.> front yard. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| <otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote - quote - > is what you attempted. The MINUS part of the prescription
How do you know that?> PREVENTS recovery. - quote - > I have seen "over-prescription" where the person has
36 people wore excess minus for a year. None of them got more nearsighted> 20/40 (DMV testing standard) vision. An he is > prescribed a -2.0 diopter lens. Call it an error, > call it "standard practice" -- but that person should > not be wearing a minus lens ALL THE TIME. (I have > yet to hear a OD suggest to the parent that the child > AVOID wearing the minus -- unless absolutly necessary.) than their peers. Show us a larger, more valid study. - quote - > The agressive use of the plus is most likely have to
Magical thinking.> be under the "control" of the person himself. While > difficult, it beats wearing the minus. - quote - > But then
Emotional appeal.> it becomes clear that the person himself must > take the responsibilty to check his own eye chart -- > and make certain that he passes all legal requirements > that apply to him. - quote - > In fact the "prescription" of a bi-focal for my sister's
And Dr. Colgate has published his successes where?> kids was a valuable experience. That convinced her that > the plus was the "second opinion". It also convinced > the "kids" that they would have to take the responsibility > to use the plus strongly, as recommended by Dr. Colgate. - quote - > So they kept their vison clear -- while the minus lens
My kids avoided nearsightedness. I believe it was the totem I placed in our> people (as per the Oakley-Young study) see THEIR vision > going down by -1/2 dipoter per year. THEY learned > from the "Young" study -- and you do not. front yard. - quote - > But I do agree that if I were in YOUR position -- I
Yes.. that nagging demand for efficacy...> could not "help" the public with this. - quote - > In fact that situation was clear from my
You didn't say anything about all those OD's who quit recommending plus..> discussions with Dr. Raphaelson. The person > himself will have to make this decision -- before > it gets "out of hand". That was my question... -MT |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Dear Mike, Subject: Prevention -- under the person's control - quote - > From the Oakley-Young study it was clear to me that the "preventive" effort could not be prescribed. In fact, "prescribing" a minus lens (as part of the plus) is what you attempted. The MINUS part of the prescription PREVENTS recovery. I have seen "over-prescription" where the person has 20/40 (DMV testing standard) vision. An he is prescribed a -2.0 diopter lens. Call it an error, call it "standard practice" -- but that person should not be wearing a minus lens ALL THE TIME. (I have yet to hear a OD suggest to the parent that the child AVOID wearing the minus -- unless absolutly necessary.) The agressive use of the plus is most likely have to be under the "control" of the person himself. While difficult, it beats wearing the minus. But then it becomes clear that the person himself must take the responsibilty to check his own eye chart -- and make certain that he passes all legal requirements that apply to him. In fact the "prescription" of a bi-focal for my sister's kids was a valuable experience. That convinced her that the plus was the "second opinion". It also convinced the "kids" that they would have to take the responsibility to use the plus strongly, as recommended by Dr. Colgate. So they kept their vison clear -- while the minus lens people (as per the Oakley-Young study) see THEIR vision going down by -1/2 dipoter per year. THEY learned from the "Young" study -- and you do not. But I do agree that if I were in YOUR position -- I could not "help" the public with this. In fact that situation was clear from my discussions with Dr. Raphaelson. The person himself will have to make this decision -- before it gets "out of hand". Best, Otis +++++++++++++++++++++ Mike Tyner wrote: - quote - > <otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote > > This would be a "new" method of "practice" which I would TOTALLY > > SUPPORT. > Ah... so you think this is new? What about all those ODs who QUIT doing it? > -MT |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Gray, by definition, supresses all colors equally. Brown, or any other color, does not. When you are sitting in bright sunlight and eating a garden salad, you can see the greens and browns of the salad much better through the grey lenses than brown. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Grey, by definition, supresses all colors equally. Brown, or any other color, does not. So, if you are sitting in bright sunlight looking at a gardan salad with grey lenses, it is easier to see the browns and greens in the salad through grey lenses than brown ones. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| re: the transition lenses - which is better - the gray or brown tint? is there a difference? |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Robert wrote: - quote - > What do all y'all think of Transitions lenses - useful addition, or should
overcast day, but that's probably just what you want. Interestingly they> Otis push them along with his plus lenses? > Robert > The sheep died in the wool. Overall, they're pretty good. Obviously they don't go as dark on an go darker on cold days than on hot days. Arguably their biggest drawback is the time taken to fade from tinted to clear when you come inside - but this is improving with every new version released (every few years or so). Dom |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| they work fine if you are in direct sunlight. they do not change tint well behind windshields or windows since they filter out significant quantities of UV light themselves and UV is what causes the change in tint. I have several pairs. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Seriously-what is the experts opinion of Transition lenses? R Punning was fecund nature to Shakespeare. "Robert" <rf1776[at]hhhhotmail.com> wrote in message news:I4w0f.847$sE3.399[at]lakeread07... - quote - > What do all y'all think of Transitions lenses - useful addition, or > should Otis push them along with his plus lenses? > Robert > The sheep died in the wool. |