Go Back   Earth Vision Correction > Main Category > Vision

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #12  
Old 10-06-2005, 06:17 PM
The Real Bev
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Segue

Robert wrote:
- quote -

> What do all y'all think of Transitions lenses - useful addition, or should
> Otis push them along with his plus lenses?

I bought some (plastic) maybe 4 years ago. Worthless. Not enough UV in the
car to make them turn, and driving is what I really wanted them for. I should
have demanded my money back because nobody warmed me, but I didn't. I had
glass photogray lenses for a long time and was very happy with them.

Perhaps the plastic ones are better now.

--
Cheers,
Bev
------------------- Don't you just KNOW that there is more than one
Sierra Club member who is absolutely sure that the
dinosaurs died out because of something humans did?
Alt 10-06-2005, 06:17 PM
LaSalute.net
ads
 
Standard Sponsored links

  #11  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:42 PM
Neil Brooks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Segue

"Mike Tyner" <mtyner[at]mindspring.com> wrote:

- quote -

> My kids avoided nearsightedness. I believe it was the totem I placed in our
> front yard.

Ah, they must have used it agressively, and at the threshhold.
  #10  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:37 PM
Mike Tyner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Segue


<otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote

- quote -

> is what you attempted. The MINUS part of the prescription
> PREVENTS recovery.

How do you know that?

- quote -

> I have seen "over-prescription" where the person has
> 20/40 (DMV testing standard) vision. An he is
> prescribed a -2.0 diopter lens. Call it an error,
> call it "standard practice" -- but that person should
> not be wearing a minus lens ALL THE TIME. (I have
> yet to hear a OD suggest to the parent that the child
> AVOID wearing the minus -- unless absolutly necessary.)

36 people wore excess minus for a year. None of them got more nearsighted
than their peers. Show us a larger, more valid study.

- quote -

> The agressive use of the plus is most likely have to
> be under the "control" of the person himself. While
> difficult, it beats wearing the minus.

Magical thinking.

- quote -

> But then
> it becomes clear that the person himself must
> take the responsibilty to check his own eye chart --
> and make certain that he passes all legal requirements
> that apply to him.

Emotional appeal.

- quote -

> In fact the "prescription" of a bi-focal for my sister's
> kids was a valuable experience. That convinced her that
> the plus was the "second opinion". It also convinced
> the "kids" that they would have to take the responsibility
> to use the plus strongly, as recommended by Dr. Colgate.

And Dr. Colgate has published his successes where?

- quote -

> So they kept their vison clear -- while the minus lens
> people (as per the Oakley-Young study) see THEIR vision
> going down by -1/2 dipoter per year. THEY learned
> from the "Young" study -- and you do not.

My kids avoided nearsightedness. I believe it was the totem I placed in our
front yard.

- quote -

> But I do agree that if I were in YOUR position -- I
> could not "help" the public with this.

Yes.. that nagging demand for efficacy...

- quote -

> In fact that situation was clear from my
> discussions with Dr. Raphaelson. The person
> himself will have to make this decision -- before
> it gets "out of hand".

You didn't say anything about all those OD's who quit recommending plus..
That was my question...

-MT


  #9  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:26 PM
otisbrown@pa.net
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Segue


Dear Mike,

Subject: Prevention -- under the person's control

- quote -

> From the Oakley-Young study it was clear to me that
the "preventive" effort could not be prescribed.

In fact, "prescribing" a minus lens (as part of the plus)
is what you attempted. The MINUS part of the prescription
PREVENTS recovery.

I have seen "over-prescription" where the person has
20/40 (DMV testing standard) vision. An he is
prescribed a -2.0 diopter lens. Call it an error,
call it "standard practice" -- but that person should
not be wearing a minus lens ALL THE TIME. (I have
yet to hear a OD suggest to the parent that the child
AVOID wearing the minus -- unless absolutly necessary.)

The agressive use of the plus is most likely have to
be under the "control" of the person himself. While
difficult, it beats wearing the minus. But then
it becomes clear that the person himself must
take the responsibilty to check his own eye chart --
and make certain that he passes all legal requirements
that apply to him.

In fact the "prescription" of a bi-focal for my sister's
kids was a valuable experience. That convinced her that
the plus was the "second opinion". It also convinced
the "kids" that they would have to take the responsibility
to use the plus strongly, as recommended by Dr. Colgate.

So they kept their vison clear -- while the minus lens
people (as per the Oakley-Young study) see THEIR vision
going down by -1/2 dipoter per year. THEY learned
from the "Young" study -- and you do not.

But I do agree that if I were in YOUR position -- I
could not "help" the public with this.
In fact that situation was clear from my
discussions with Dr. Raphaelson. The person
himself will have to make this decision -- before
it gets "out of hand".

Best,

Otis

+++++++++++++++++++++




Mike Tyner wrote:
- quote -

> <otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote
> > This would be a "new" method of "practice" which I would TOTALLY
> > SUPPORT.
> Ah... so you think this is new? What about all those ODs who QUIT doing it?
> -MT

  #8  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:09 PM
doctor_my_eye@msn.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Segue

Gray, by definition, supresses all colors equally. Brown, or any other
color, does not. When you are sitting in bright sunlight and eating a
garden salad, you can see the greens and browns of the salad much
better through the grey lenses than brown.

  #7  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:04 PM
doctor_my_eye@msn.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Segue

Grey, by definition, supresses all colors equally. Brown, or any other
color, does not. So, if you are sitting in bright sunlight looking at
a gardan salad with grey lenses, it is easier to see the browns and
greens in the salad through grey lenses than brown ones.

  #6  
Old 10-05-2005, 03:23 PM
kemccx@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Segue

re: the transition lenses - which is better - the gray or brown tint?
is there a difference?

  #5  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:52 PM
Dom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Segue

Robert wrote:
- quote -

> What do all y'all think of Transitions lenses - useful addition, or should
> Otis push them along with his plus lenses?
> Robert
> The sheep died in the wool.
Overall, they're pretty good. Obviously they don't go as dark on an
overcast day, but that's probably just what you want. Interestingly they
go darker on cold days than on hot days.
Arguably their biggest drawback is the time taken to fade from tinted to
clear when you come inside - but this is improving with every new
version released (every few years or so).

Dom
  #4  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:23 PM
p.clarkii@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Segue

they work fine if you are in direct sunlight. they do not change tint
well behind windshields or windows since they filter out significant
quantities of UV light themselves and UV is what causes the change in
tint. I have several pairs.

  #3  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:05 PM
Robert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Segue

Seriously-what is the experts opinion of Transition lenses?

R

Punning was fecund nature to Shakespeare.


"Robert" <rf1776[at]hhhhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:I4w0f.847$sE3.399[at]lakeread07...
- quote -

> What do all y'all think of Transitions lenses - useful addition, or
> should Otis push them along with his plus lenses?
> Robert
> The sheep died in the wool.


 

Tags
segue


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:30 AM.