|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Salmon Egg wrote: - quote - > What is the purpose of such lenses? Certainly, a 100D or even a 200D lens is
In eye exams, +90 D lenses are used (although 78 is more common) in> not all that difficult to get if the numerical aperture (or f/no.) is not a > problem. It is done for microscope lenses all the time. conjunction with a slit lamp biomicroscope to get a nice, although inverted, binocular view of the retina. Useful especially for fine 3-D viewing of the macula. I can't think of any use for 100 D or more single lenses. w.stacy, o.d. |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On 12/30/05 7:41 AM, in article 1135957294.960703.261070[at]g47g...oglegroups.com, "acemanvx[at]yahoo.com" <acemanvx[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > http://www.msiprecision.com/catalog/images/OI-100M.jpg
What is the purpose of such lenses? Certainly, a 100D or even a 200D lens is> http://www.msiprecision.com/catalog/images/OI-120M.jpg > http://lpoproducts.com/Products/images/LPO189.jpg not all that difficult to get if the numerical aperture (or f/no.) is not a problem. It is done for microscope lenses all the time. Bill -- Ferme le Bush |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| William Stacy wrote: You get the same effect if - quote - > you hold any plus lens farther away from your eyes than it's focal length.
(providing the object viewed is also beyond the lenses' focal length) |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| acemanvx[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > Thanks! So if one were to look thru say a +120d lense, would he be
Yes, and it doesn't need to be that strong. You get the same effect if> seeing everything upside down? you hold any plus lens farther away from your eyes than it's focal length. - quote - > Also whats the difference between dioptric value and magnification
microscopes or other multiple lens systems you have to multiply the> times? Take a magnifying glass lens thats marked as 10x for example or > a microscope eyepiece marked as 10x, 15x, 20x or so? What dioptric > value would such lenses have? approximately 4 D. per x mag. applies to single lens systems, with components. (gross simplification/approximation) |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Thanks! So if one were to look thru say a +120d lense, would he be seeing everything upside down? Also whats the difference between dioptric value and magnification times? Take a magnifying glass lens thats marked as 10x for example or a microscope eyepiece marked as 10x, 15x, 20x or so? What dioptric value would such lenses have? |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > If one were to look into a lens with a dioptric value higher than the
Yes. The real, inverted image forms between the lens and the observer.> axial length of your eye, would light focus *outside* your eyeball? This very common technique is called indirect ophthalmoscopy. Would there be a difference between a +66, +78, - quote - > +90, +100 or even +120?
Yes. Image size and field of view. +20 D. lenses are only used with anopthalmoscope, 78 and 90 are only used with a slit lamp. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| http://www.msiprecision.com/catalog/images/OI-100M.jpg http://www.msiprecision.com/catalog/images/OI-120M.jpg http://lpoproducts.com/Products/images/LPO189.jpg I never knew it was possible to make such high plus diopter lenses! I researched into this when my ophthamologist used a +90 diopter lense to look in my eyes. That thing was nearly spherical not unlike a marble! If one were to look into a lens with a dioptric value higher than the axial length of your eye, would light focus *outside* your eyeball? I know an emmetropic eyeball is +60 diopters and placing a plus lens makes light focus in front of the retina but as long as the lens is less than +60 light would come to a focus still inside your eye. How do the optics of a lens higher than +60 work if light now comes to a focus *outside* your eye? Would there be a difference between a +66, +78, +90, +100 or even +120? Would light of a super high plus come in focus at a point still inside the lens? Or right after it finishes traveling thru the lens? Would you be able to see clearly from 1cm away from your eyeball itself or 1cm away from the surface of the plus lens when its held to your eye? How high can plus lenses get really? |
| Tags |
| 100, 120, diopter, high, lenses, super, wow |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Serebel is super rude and Ragnar is always wrong Ace: Notice how Serebel calls me "retard" and other people "stupid" Notice how Ragnar spreads misinformation on lasik and contact lenses. | Lasik Eye Surgery | 2 | 08-31-2006 12:27 AM | |
| Anyone can recommend some super good ophthalmologist who are good at retina detachment? jave: I'm a sutdent in Provo, utah. The retina of my right eye was found detached last March. I took an surgury at that time. Dr. John Carver did that... | Lasik Eye Surgery | 9 | 02-27-2006 02:57 AM | |
| Steady progress in high and super-high myopia g.gatti@agora.it: Hallo to all, I see the old marpions are still here, so to speak, and are stable in their practice, so far so good for them. Now I had the... | Vision | 8 | 08-09-2005 03:06 PM | |
| Ciba N&D requiring different power to other lenses Clive: I have just read (http://www.siliconehydrogels.com/editorials/previous_editorials_kathryn5.asp) and this states: Other Optical Considerations... | Vision | 5 | 10-20-2004 04:23 PM | |
| Super-Vision is a short-lived marketing tool which is no longer used Ragnar Suomi: All this criticism of "Super Vision" is a bit moot. It was a marketing tool used to promote Wavefront LASIK. It suggested that people would have... | Lasik Eye Surgery | 3 | 08-04-2004 06:51 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |