|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Or better yet, find what you want then go on Ebay to buy them at 1/4 the cost. I am partial to Vuarnet but you can find anything out there. |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| The Real Bev wrote: - quote - > Mike Tyner wrote:
I like the Rudy Project shades I have now. They're not> > "tenplay" <tenplay[at]mail.com> wrote > > > > I want to get a pair of sunglasses that allows me to > > > see clearly in bright sunlight. The inexpensive ones I > > > have work well most of the time but really fail when > > > hit by direct sunlight. What features should I be > > > looking for? Does the lens need a non-glare coating? > > > Are there some good OTC sunglasses or do I need to > > > order them by prescription? Thanks for any advice. > > > I used to buy OTC sunglasses. Name brands were ok, but I > > once bought a cheap pair that behaved exactly as you > > described. > > > I'm convinced they used a cheaper plastic, one that > > scatters light more. Most name brands use the same > > acrylic that prescription glasses are made of, called > > CR39. I never noticed the light-scattering effect in > > Foster Grants or other $10-$20 sunglasses. But it was > > very noticeable in the cheapies - walking out from under > > a porch into the sunlight there was a definite "fog" > > appreciable with direct sunlight. > > > I'm sure the scattering was a separate problem from > > waves, coatings, and distortion. > I think Oakley M-frames are made of thin sheets of > polycarbonate. I really like those and am regretful that > since they're no longer fashionable you can't find $10 > knockoffs any more. inexpensive but I keep shades forever. Rudy has an unconditional lens guarantee. $15 and you can replace your lenses for any reason. They are not as good as the Nikons I retired because I was getting a bit worried about having glass in front of my eyes. They also were getting a bit heavy. I had them for more than 4? years or so. Nikon made shades for a very short amount of time (not just the frames). Darkest shade of neutral grey, double gradient mirrored, polarized, glass. The unique thing about the Nikons is that they put all the coatings on the inside of the sandwich (maybe not the AR coating). Can't rub them off or scratch them. Nikon or their retailers were dumping them at huge discounts when they got out of the business. Not sure if you can find them any more. Maybe technology has caught up but I always believed the way to go for no compromise shades was: Glass - best optics Darkest shade of neutral grey - it really is color neutral Polarized - *huge* difference with respect to fatigue Double gradient mirrored - I'm not so sure about the glare reduction but it does make it darker. I drove a semi so the glare came from above and below. AR coated. Downside is they're not so safe, heavy, and limited wrap. -Quick |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Mike Tyner wrote: - quote - > "tenplay" <tenplay[at]mail.com> wrote
I think Oakley M-frames are made of thin sheets of polycarbonate. I really> > I want to get a pair of sunglasses that allows me to see clearly in bright > > sunlight. The inexpensive ones I have work well most of the time but > > really fail when hit by direct sunlight. What features should I be looking > > for? Does the lens need a non-glare coating? Are there some good OTC > > sunglasses or do I need to order them by prescription? Thanks for any > > advice. > I used to buy OTC sunglasses. Name brands were ok, but I once bought a cheap > pair that behaved exactly as you described. > I'm convinced they used a cheaper plastic, one that scatters light more. > Most name brands use the same acrylic that prescription glasses are made of, > called CR39. I never noticed the light-scattering effect in Foster Grants or > other $10-$20 sunglasses. But it was very noticeable in the cheapies - > walking out from under a porch into the sunlight there was a definite "fog" > appreciable with direct sunlight. > I'm sure the scattering was a separate problem from waves, coatings, and > distortion. like those and am regretful that since they're no longer fashionable you can't find $10 knockoffs any more. -- Cheers, Bev ------------------------------- "Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket." -- George Orwell |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| drfrank21[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > The cheapies (those throw away sunglasses you can get for a few bucks)
We've had this discussion before, but hey, it's always a fun game.> can have moderate to heavy distortion/warpage in the lenses which can > cause > problems with fatigue and strain compared to the quality ones such > as Ray Bans, Serengeti's. You get what you pay for. It's possible, by holding the cheapies at a distance and moving them around in front of a vertical line, to determine whether they have any distortion at all. Thus far I have found none. My former optician looked at one pair of them with <some machine> and asked me where I got them so he could get some. I've got a couple of pairs of decent big polarized lightweight sunglasses for $5/pair at the Big 5 sporting goods store -- ask for the cheap ones for fishermen that they have on sale every once in a while -- normal price is $7. -- Cheers, Bev ------------------------------- "Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket." -- George Orwell |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| It is really simple. You go to a good SG store, put a few hundred bucks on the counter and tell the clerk you want to try the specs on outside in the sun. Take a pair at a time out and find a lens you think is best, then worry about what the frame looks like. p.s. Ray Ban are shit, try Serengetti, Revo, Maui Jim, Vuarnet, Oakley and Bolle. They all have different properties so will do different things. Personally, I am yet to find better lenses than Mako, but you can't get them over there. dr grant |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "tenplay" <tenplay[at]mail.com> wrote - quote - > I want to get a pair of sunglasses that allows me to see clearly in bright
I used to buy OTC sunglasses. Name brands were ok, but I once bought a cheap> sunlight. The inexpensive ones I have work well most of the time but > really fail when hit by direct sunlight. What features should I be looking > for? Does the lens need a non-glare coating? Are there some good OTC > sunglasses or do I need to order them by prescription? Thanks for any > advice. pair that behaved exactly as you described. I'm convinced they used a cheaper plastic, one that scatters light more. Most name brands use the same acrylic that prescription glasses are made of, called CR39. I never noticed the light-scattering effect in Foster Grants or other $10-$20 sunglasses. But it was very noticeable in the cheapies - walking out from under a porch into the sunlight there was a definite "fog" appreciable with direct sunlight. I'm sure the scattering was a separate problem from waves, coatings, and distortion. -MT |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| The cheapies (those throw away sunglasses you can get for a few bucks) can have moderate to heavy distortion/warpage in the lenses which can cause problems with fatigue and strain compared to the quality ones such as Ray Bans, Serengeti's. You get what you pay for. frank |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <hOKdnfHCHon94G7enZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d[at]comcast.com> , "Mark A" <nobody[at]nowhere.com> wrote: - quote - > A prescription is only necessary if the lenses have a power. In the US, you can get reading glasses without a prescription. - quote - > It is possible that you can have custom made plano lenses (no power) to a
Costco used to (and may still) advertise these in the store, for really> fit any frame, with various coatings as you desire from a regular eyewear > shop, but no Rx is needed. cheap. Don't quote me, but it may have been as little as US$5 over the cost of the frame. -- Dan Abel dabel[at]sonic.net Petaluma, California, USA |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "tenplay" <tenplay[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:84qdnfbmHfrxem_eRVn-oA[at]comcast.com... - quote - > I want to get a pair of sunglasses that allows me to see clearly in bright
A prescription is only necessary if the lenses have a power.> sunlight. The inexpensive ones I have work well most of the time but > really fail when hit by direct sunlight. What features should I be looking > for? Does the lens need a non-glare coating? Are there some good OTC > sunglasses or do I need to order them by prescription? Thanks for any > advice. It is possible that you can have custom made plano lenses (no power) to a fit any frame, with various coatings as you desire from a regular eyewear shop, but no Rx is needed. |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <84qdnfbmHfrxem_eRVn-oA[at]comcast.com> , tenplay <tenplay[at]mail.com> wrote: - quote - > I want to get a pair of sunglasses that allows me to see clearly in
A hat? That's what I use. I almost never wear sunglasses, but *always*> bright sunlight. The inexpensive ones I have work well most of the time > but really fail when hit by direct sunlight. What features should I be > looking for? wear a hat (although not just to help me see). I'll be wearing sunglasses tomorrow morning because I expect that my eyes will be major dilated. -- Dan Abel dabel[at]sonic.net Petaluma, California, USA |
| Tags |
| choosing, sunglasses |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| choosing surgeon latinachristina2006@yahoo.com: I am decided to have the surgery very soon. I have been deciding from two surgeon doctors in my area. One is Andrew Caster and one is Robert... | Lasik Eye Surgery | 1 | 11-14-2006 01:26 PM | |
| Choosing a contact lens Robert Kopp: Many people on this list have chosen a contact lens, but the context in which I'm doing it may be interesting. I have had a cataract operation in... | Vision | 19 | 07-11-2005 01:18 AM | |
| Need help in choosing new PALs pmcox@marshallnet.com: I am currently wearing Rodenstock Life C lenses. I have a new prescription in which my right eye has gone from -6.25 to -6.00 in about a year, and... | Vision | 4 | 04-13-2005 09:43 PM | |
| Choosing a procedure and machine D Reed: Hi all, I've been researching various forms of laser eye surgery and eventually stumbled upon this newsgroup. I have some questions that you... | Lasik Eye Surgery | 16 | 09-17-2004 01:42 AM | |
| Choosing new Anti-r. coating and "poly carb." vs "high-index" Craig: Dear folks: I am a layman who is getting a new prescription filled soon. I am seeing an eye specialist next week for an eye exam. I am posting... | Vision | 9 | 08-02-2004 12:41 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |