Go Back   Earth Vision Correction > Main Category > Vision

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #13  
Old 03-15-2006, 11:07 PM
Don W
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telescopes and low vision.

- quote -

> I will assume tha tyou are raving about Don's response about exit pupil
> diameter.
> I think Don got the wrong figures. He seems to be measuring the lens
> diameter, not exit pupil.

Yes, I did measure the lens diameter only not the exit pupil.

- quote -

> The exit pupil, Don, is an optical point, in this case probably 12-13mm
> behind the back of the eyepiece. It can be made longer or nearer
> depending on what the designer wants to achieve. For example,
> Eschenbach make low vision aids with exit pupils at 18mm to enable
> spectacle wear while viewing with the telescope.
> What is an exit pupil? This is the point that the light crosses that is
> designed to be where your pupil sits when looking through the system.
> If you are not at the exit pupil, then your field of view will be
> smaller. The exit pupil if designed correctly and matches the pupils
> size will transmit the maximum light possible (especially if the front
> lens is a large diameter) which would produce the relative improvement
> in brightness.
> Don, if you are having issues, you would be well advised to see a low
> vision expert and get some aids to give adequate viewing for the tasks
> you need. Low vision aids are different from standard telescopes as
> they are designed to be smaller and lighter in most cases so the can be
> easily transported and stored in pockets. They are generally designed
> to be used monocularly to achieve better magnification.

Excuse the delay. OK as far as the "exit pupil diameter" sitting 12-13 mm
behind the eyepiece. The question (puzzlement) is this. If I look at a
visual scene my 5mm scotoma occupies so much of my visual field.
Computable. But if I put the 7x's to my eye (blocking the good/better eye)
the view is much more enhanced. Much more than if I walked 7x closer, it
seems. The central field (5 degrees) is much more clearer. There is the
angular multiplication of course involved, but the scotoma just looks
reduced significantly. The low vision specialist is not considered now
since the better eye is better than 20/20. But the reduction of the scotoma
on the binocular (ok monocular) view is the question. Originally I had
thought there might be some principle of light magnification (more light)
involved that would enhance the central view. But I am gathering the answer
is no.

Thanks all for comments,
Don W.


Alt 03-15-2006, 11:07 PM
LaSalute.net
ads
 
Standard Sponsored links

  #12  
Old 03-14-2006, 08:11 PM
CatmanX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telescopes and low vision.

WTF is Bev on about?

I will assume tha tyou are raving about Don's response about exit pupil
diameter.

I think Don got the wrong figures. He seems to be measuring the lens
diameter, not exit pupil.

The exit pupil, Don, is an optical point, in this case probably 12-13mm
behind the back of the eyepiece. It can be made longer or nearer
depending on what the designer wants to achieve. For example,
Eschenbach make low vision aids with exit pupils at 18mm to enable
spectacle wear while viewing with the telescope.

What is an exit pupil? This is the point that the light crosses that is
designed to be where your pupil sits when looking through the system.
If you are not at the exit pupil, then your field of view will be
smaller. The exit pupil if designed correctly and matches the pupils
size will transmit the maximum light possible (especially if the front
lens is a large diameter) which would produce the relative improvement
in brightness.

Don, if you are having issues, you would be well advised to see a low
vision expert and get some aids to give adequate viewing for the tasks
you need. Low vision aids are different from standard telescopes as
they are designed to be smaller and lighter in most cases so the can be
easily transported and stored in pockets. They are generally designed
to be used monocularly to achieve better magnification.

Best of luck

dr grant

Don,

  #11  
Old 03-14-2006, 05:35 PM
Salmon Egg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telescopes and low vision.

On 3/13/06 10:54 PM, in article RMtRf.324$uu6.286[at]fe06.lga, "The Real Bev"
<bashley101+usenet[at]gmail.com> wrote:

- quote -

> I would guess that all binoculars have roughly the same size exit pupil, the
> main difference being in focal length and [big] lens diameter. Wrong?

Yes. Wrong. Very often the exit pupil of binoculars is smaller than a dark
adapted eye. Bird watchers, for example, may want relatively high
magnification without the weight of large optics. Naval officers will want
to have "night glasses."

To estimate exit pupil size, take the diameter of the objective and divide
by the magnification. Thus the exit pupil for 7x50 is about 7mm. Note that
almost all optic sizes are measured metrically. I do remember control
drawings in which metric sizes wer converted to inches.

Bill
-- Ferme le Bush


  #10  
Old 03-14-2006, 05:54 AM
The Real Bev
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telescopes and low vision.

Salmon Egg wrote:

- quote -

> On 3/13/06 8:41 PM, in article PPrRf.253$GM6.113[at]fe07.lga, "The Real Bev"
> <bashley101+usenet[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > Why is the answer to the question NOT "Because the diameter of the binocular
> > lenses is bigger than the diameter of the lens of the eye"? Did my friend
> > really waste her money on that honking monster lens so she can take pictures
> > in near darkness?
> I am not sure what you are getting at because you did not quote the
> pertinent part. IIRC, the binocular spec quoted by the original poster was 7
> X 19, That makes the binocular's exit pupil SMALLER than the eye's pupil.
> There is an inconsistency in the OP.

I would guess that all binoculars have roughly the same size exit pupil, the
main difference being in focal length and [big] lens diameter. Wrong?

--
Cheers, Bev
**********************************************
"I've had a Lucas pacemaker for years and have
never experienced any prob
  #9  
Old 03-14-2006, 04:13 AM
Salmon Egg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telescopes and low vision.

On 3/13/06 8:41 PM, in article PPrRf.253$GM6.113[at]fe07.lga, "The Real Bev"
<bashley101+usenet[at]gmail.com> wrote:

- quote -

> Why is the answer to the question NOT "Because the diameter of the binocular
> lenses is bigger than the diameter of the lens of the eye"? Did my friend
> really waste her money on that honking monster lens so she can take pictures
> in near darkness?

I am not sure what you are getting at because you did not quote the
pertinent part. IIRC, the binocular spec quoted by the original poster was 7
X 19, That makes the binocular's exit pupil SMALLER than the eye's pupil.
There is an inconsistency in the OP.

Bill

-- Ferme le Bush


  #8  
Old 03-14-2006, 03:41 AM
The Real Bev
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telescopes and low vision.

Don W wrote:

- quote -

> > > > I will start by stating I am not a health professional.
> > > You made a trick question out of your inquiry by leaving important
> > information out.
> > > Are you talking about a permanent scotoma? How bi a field of view does it
> > cover? Do you have a diagnosis.
> > > I had some similar problems which later turned out to be ocular migraine.
> > Fortunately the scotoma was temporary. Well, at least until I had a more
> > serious problem that I took to be a recurrence of the migraine.
> > > Bill
> > -- Ferme le Bush
> Yes, diagnosed as permanent scotoma, as far as I know.
> Please see above reply for spec.

Why is the answer to the question NOT "Because the diameter of the binocular
lenses is bigger than the diameter of the lens of the eye"? Did my friend
really waste her money on that honking monster lens so she can take pictures
in near darkness?

Yeah, I'm testy today...

--
Cheers,
Bev
================================================== =====================
"Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things that I cannot change,
the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to hide the
bodies of the people who pissed me off."
  #7  
Old 03-12-2006, 04:12 AM
Salmon Egg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telescopes and low vision.

On 3/11/06 10:22 AM, in article
gzEQf.19659$NS6.16991[at]newssvr30.news.prodigy.com, "Don W"
<dwilgus[at]prodigy.net> wrote:

- quote -

> "CatmanX" <drgrant[at]ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> news:1142049577.655414.79240[at]v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> > I think you will find it relates to the size of the exit pupil of the
> > telescope. Low vision aids are designed to get as much light into the
> > eye for improved vision.
> > > dr grant
> > Dr. Grant,
> This is the effect I am seeing with a conventional 7x binocular. The exit
> pupil image enhancement math presently eludes me. The binocular is 7x, I am
> just looking thru one one side, the scotoma side.
> Entrance pupil diameter of binocular = 0.75 inch / 19 mm
> Exit pupil diameter of binocular = 0.43 inch / 10.9 mm
> Eye pupil diameter = 0.150 inch / 3.8 mm
> The binocular is a Nikon 7x20 7.1 degrees.
> So does the math agree with what I am seeing??
> Thanks for any inputs.
> Don W.
If YOUR pupil is indeed 3.8 mm in diameter then the binoculars are indeed
setting the exit pupil for the system. With the eye's position at the
optimum spot, the exit pupil should have a diameter of 19/7=2.7mm. Most
binoculars do not fully utilize the calculated exit pupil. In any event,
getting maximum illumination onto the retina is not going to be the
limitation when there is a true permanent scotoma.

Bill

-- Ferme le Bush


  #6  
Old 03-11-2006, 05:26 PM
Don W
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telescopes and low vision.

- quote -

> > I will start by stating I am not a health professional.
> You made a trick question out of your inquiry by leaving important
> information out.
> Are you talking about a permanent scotoma? How bi a field of view does it
> cover? Do you have a diagnosis.
> I had some similar problems which later turned out to be ocular migraine.
> Fortunately the scotoma was temporary. Well, at least until I had a more
> serious problem that I took to be a recurrence of the migraine.
> Bill
> -- Ferme le Bush

Yes, diagnosed as permanent scotoma, as far as I know.
Please see above reply for spec.

Thanks.
Don W.



  #5  
Old 03-11-2006, 05:22 PM
Don W
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telescopes and low vision.


"CatmanX" <drgrant[at]ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:1142049577.655414.79240[at]v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
- quote -

> I think you will find it relates to the size of the exit pupil of the
> telescope. Low vision aids are designed to get as much light into the
> eye for improved vision.
> dr grant
Dr. Grant,

This is the effect I am seeing with a conventional 7x binocular. The exit
pupil image enhancement math presently eludes me. The binocular is 7x, I am
just looking thru one one side, the scotoma side.
Entrance pupil diameter of binocular = 0.75 inch / 19 mm
Exit pupil diameter of binocular = 0.43 inch / 10.9 mm
Eye pupil diameter = 0.150 inch / 3.8 mm

The binocular is a Nikon 7x20 7.1 degrees.

So does the math agree with what I am seeing??
Thanks for any inputs.

Don W.


  #4  
Old 03-11-2006, 04:50 AM
Salmon Egg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telescopes and low vision.

On 3/10/06 6:19 PM, in article
LsqQf.21129$tb3.7014[at]newssvr24.news.prodigy.net, "Don W"
<dwilgus[at]prodigy.net> wrote:

- quote -

> > > > > There is a good reason for the opposite to be tru and is easy to observe.
> > Atmospheric turbulence can really screw up what you see (bad seeing). It
> > is
> > most easily observed on a hot sunny day when looking across a parking lot.
> > > Bill
> > -- Ferme le Bush
> I have a scotoma that covers the central field. MD. Very apparent
> improvement when viewing things with a (say a 7x) telescope. But..... when
> I get 7x closer physically, the improvement does not seems as much (without
> the telescope).
> The scotoma seems to have shifted away from the central field a bit with
> the scope.
> Don W.
I will start by stating I am not a health professional.

You made a trick question out of your inquiry by leaving important
information out.

Are you talking about a permanent scotoma? How bi a field of view does it
cover? Do you have a diagnosis.

I had some similar problems which later turned out to be ocular migraine.
Fortunately the scotoma was temporary. Well, at least until I had a more
serious problem that I took to be a recurrence of the migraine.

Bill
-- Ferme le Bush


 

Tags
low, telescopes, vision


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:22 PM.