|
#29
| |||
| |||
| In article <1143083125.635931.144990[at]i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> , "serebel" <serebel[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Dan Abel wrote:
Thanks. Makes sense now.> In article <1142992174.160495.302...[at]j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> , > "serebel" <sere...[at]aol.com> wrote: > > Okay, I will clarify, You can whine to all the webbies you want, this > What's a "webbie"? > Well, webmaster, hall monitors, etc. -- Dan Abel dabel[at]sonic.net Petaluma, California, USA |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#28
| |||
| |||
| Dan Abel wrote: In article <1142992174.160495.302...[at]j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> , "serebel" <sere...[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Okay, I will clarify, You can whine to all the webbies you want, this What's a "webbie"? -- Dan Abel d...[at]sonic.net Petaluma, California, USA Well, webmaster, hall monitors, etc. |
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:32:49 GMT, "Dick Adams" <bad.addr[at]nonexist.comwrote: - quote - > Abandon all hope!
Don't be so hard on yourself, Dick.> Even if you killfile the major nuisances, you will still see their > crap dragged out and around again and again by idiots who have > nothing better to do. |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| Abandon all hope! Even if you killfile the major nuisances, you will still see their crap dragged out and around again and again by idiots who have nothing better to do. |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| On 21 Mar 2006 15:22:37 -0800, "Neil Brooks" <neil0502[at]yahoo.comwrote: - quote - > Neil Brooks wrote:
Uncle Otie? Aren't you going to answer this simple, direct question??> > otisbrown[at]pa.net wrote: > > > > At the threshold you have nothing > > > to lose > > > You SURE about that, Uncle Otis?? Developing eyes ... without > > substantive refractive error?? > Otis?? - quote - > > You're SURE that there's no potential for harm with unnecessarily
Uncle Otie? Aren't you going to answer this simple, direct question??> > interfering with the near-vision triad of accommodation, convergence, > > and mydriasis?? > Otis?? - quote - > > You're SURE that this won't induce -phorias in otherwise healthy eyes??
Uncle Otie? Aren't you going to answer this simple, direct question??> Otis?? - quote - > > Do you have any data to support this conclusion, or are you--as
This one's rhetorical....> > usual--just vocalizing from your anus? > Otis?? - quote - > > I wonder if this has anything to do with that State of Pennsylvania
Actually, this one is, too....> > investigation into your activities. I imagine it could. > Otis?? |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| In article <1142992174.160495.302400[at]j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> , "serebel" <serebel[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Okay, I will clarify, You can whine to all the webbies you want, this What's a "webbie"? -- Dan Abel dabel[at]sonic.net Petaluma, California, USA |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Okay, I will clarify, You can whine to all the webbies you want, this
Whatever...> is an UNMODERATED site. |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| On 21 Mar 2006 17:49:34 -0800, "serebel" <serebel[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Central scrutee wrote:
Very kind of you to own up to your erroneous attribution like that....> > Central Scrutinizer wrote: > Please be careful how you post and how you quote, serebel. This post > suggests that I posted a warning about Neil and CatmanX, which I DID > NOT. > Okay, I will clarify, You can whine to all the webbies you want, this > is an UNMODERATED site. People can post as they so choose, if it > offends you, too damn bad!!!! |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| Central scrutee wrote: - quote - > Central Scrutinizer wrote: Please be careful how you post and how you quote, serebel. This post suggests that I posted a warning about Neil and CatmanX, which I DID NOT. Okay, I will clarify, You can whine to all the webbies you want, this is an UNMODERATED site. People can post as they so choose, if it offends you, too damn bad!!!! |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| Neil Brooks wrote: - quote - > otisbrown[at]pa.net wrote:
Otis??> > At the threshold you have nothing > > to lose > You SURE about that, Uncle Otis?? Developing eyes ... without > substantive refractive error?? - quote - > You're SURE that there's no potential for harm with unnecessarily
Otis??> interfering with the near-vision triad of accommodation, convergence, > and mydriasis?? - quote - > You're SURE that this won't induce -phorias in otherwise healthy eyes??
Otis??- quote - > Do you have any data to support this conclusion, or are you--as
Otis??> usual--just vocalizing from your anus? - quote - > I wonder if this has anything to do with that State of Pennsylvania
Otis??> investigation into your activities. I imagine it could. |
| Tags |
| real, warning |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Ace Warning LarryDoc: Dear Ace, Please tell us what kind of computer you are using and we'll be happy to point you to the little button or switch that turns it off. ... | Vision | 5 | 02-20-2006 06:56 AM | |
| warning hindsight: >From one who's life has truly been ruined by lasik,don't take the chance.I'm not here for bickering,it doesnt help anything.If I could save... | Lasik Eye Surgery | 52 | 01-20-2006 12:24 AM | |
| **#* OTIS BROWN WARNING *#** Neil Brooks: Dear Reader, Otis Brown is in no way qualified to give medical advice. Before you consider paying attention to anything that Otis Brown... | Vision | 8 | 11-24-2005 12:56 AM | |
| Otis Warning RM: Since LarryDoc is gone, and MT has choosen to remain silent, Otis feels revived. He hopes that the misquotes, misinformation, and lies that he has... | Vision | 3 | 02-18-2005 10:23 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |