|
#12
| |||
| |||
| "MattMc via MedKB.com" <u12288[at]uwe> wrote - quote - > Yes, or I won't get it at all if I have them on. Do I have another problem
Probably not.> that's not related to my vision exactly? Sometimes binocular coordination improves (the eyes align better) when you're forced to focus through the lenses. Most pain "right behind the eye" comes from frontal sinuses. There aren't that many reasons why wearing glasses might improve sinus pain. But again, most "pain behind the eye" isn't actually in the eye at all. Sinus pain is usually worse when you wake and worse when you bend over. So if it isn't sinus, it's just binocular coordination. Wear em when you need em. -MT |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "MattMc via MedKB.com" <u12288[at]uwe> wrote - quote - > That's an interesting comment. Can you tell me what factors you would use
Glasses can be crucial for treating amblyopia and strabismus, and "full time> if > you decided it was necessary for one of your patients? wear" is often "required" for those conditions. But past the age of 9 or 10, wearing glasses doesn't alter the shape of the eye in any significant sense, nor does it have any impact on further neurological development. So the criteria for recommending glasses to adolescents and older are more practical than you might think. Glasses are "necessary" when they relieve symptoms such as blur, headache, or visual handicap. Glasses can be "necessary" for sports, power tools, and safe highways. Wear 'em when you need 'em. -MT |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Yes, or I won't get it at all if I have them on. Do I have another problem that's not related to my vision exactly? Mike Tyner wrote: - quote - > > I read somewhere that it isn't usual to get headaches with shortsighted
--> > ness. > > I do. My prescription is a regular -2 and -2.5. Sometimes I get a blinding > > headache behind one eye. Is this related to my shortsightedness? I get the > > headache when I'm not wearing glasses. > It's unusual but I presume you're saying the headache goes away if you put > the glasses back on? > If so, it's possible your headache could be a result of working beyond your > natural range; your prescription indicates you should see clearly out to > about 20 inches, with progressively more trouble beyond that point. > Working at 25 or 30 inches without glasses might account for the headache. > I'd suggest you ignore any explanation that includes the phrase "bad vision > habits." Just MHO. > -MT Message posted via MedKB.com http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200603/1 |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| That's an interesting comment. Can you tell me what factors you would use if you decided it was necessary for one of your patients? Mike Tyner wrote: - quote - > > Mike Tyner - on that basis then do you recommend to your patients that
--> > everyone with a prescription in this region wears their glasses all the > > time? > Some won't have a problem. If not, glasses shouldn't be "required" > arbitrarily. > -MT Message posted via MedKB.com http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200603/1 |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Guest via MedKB.com" <u12288[at]uwe> wrote - quote - > Mike Tyner - on that basis then do you recommend to your patients that
Some won't have a problem. If not, glasses shouldn't be "required"> everyone with a prescription in this region wears their glasses all the > time? arbitrarily. -MT |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Mike Tyner - on that basis then do you recommend to your patients that everyone with a prescription in this region wears their glasses all the time? Mike Tyner wrote: - quote - > It's unusual but I presume you're saying the headache goes away if you put
--> the glasses back on? > If so, it's possible your headache could be a result of working beyond your > natural range; your prescription indicates you should see clearly out to > about 20 inches, with progressively more trouble beyond that point. > Working at 25 or 30 inches without glasses might account for the headache. > I'd suggest you ignore any explanation that includes the phrase "bad vision > habits." Just MHO. > -MT Message posted via MedKB.com http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200603/1 |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Quick wrote: - quote - > Simon Dean wrote:
Yes of course. The facts have to be bent to prove the belief.> > Now refer to the OP's post: > > > "I get the headache when I'm not wearing glasses." > > > and then try and explain how your response is of any help > > when you write: > > > "I never get headaches when I go without glasses or with > > weaker glasses." > Ace was just pointing out that the OP is mistaken and > doesn't get headaches after all... because Ace doesn't. > -Quick |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Simon Dean wrote: - quote - > Now refer to the OP's post:
Ace was just pointing out that the OP is mistaken and> "I get the headache when I'm not wearing glasses." > and then try and explain how your response is of any help > when you write: > "I never get headaches when I go without glasses or with > weaker glasses." doesn't get headaches after all... because Ace doesn't. -Quick |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Now refer to the OP's post: "I get the headache when I'm not wearing glasses." and then try and explain how your response is of any help when you write: "I never get headaches when I go without glasses or with weaker glasses." |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| http://www.natural-vision.co.uk/how.htm good habits, bad habits http://www.natural-vision.co.uk/faq.htm |
| Tags |
| headache |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Headache after a couple weeks of contact wear Ron Bickers: I've noticed that after two or three weeks of wearing a new pair of my Proclear Compatibles, I can't wear them as long each day because I start to... | Main Category | 5 | 11-16-2003 05:46 PM | |
| Headache after a couple weeks of contact wear Ron Bickers: I've noticed that after two or three weeks of wearing a new pair of my Proclear Compatibles, I can't wear them as long each day because I start to... | Vision | 5 | 11-16-2003 05:46 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |