|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Dr. Judy, Yes, my orginal post was WITH bifocals. But in my other posts, I also described my vision WITHOUT correction, which is my normal everyday life (I don't wear correction much, except at night for driving and at work when I have to go on the manufacturing floor). The truth is, when my DO checked my eyes and gave me the -.75R / -.50 L prescription, he didn't actually test my closeup with a +1.25 add. Since I rarely wear by bifocals, I never paid attention to the fact that my left eye doesn't see fine print as well as my right eye does... *corrected*. This is why I was wondering if presbyopia can be worse in one eye and not the other. As for the *corrected* distance vision, my left eye sees slightly sharper than my right eye. I was told I could go 1/4 diopter stronger in the right eye, but it would be a bit too strong and my right eye would see sharper than my left eye (that's when he told me I'm "in between quarter diopters" in my right eye). So if I'm understanding you all, I should *not* have such a variation in corrected closeup vision (bifocal add of +1.25) if my distance vision was properly corrected (which is seems to be)?? -Tom in Scranton, PA USA Dr Judy wrote: - quote - > TomMonger wrote: > I'm getting confused now. In your original post you were (I thought) > describing your vision with bifocals on, this post seems to be about > vision with glasses off. It is normal for the more myopic eye to be > blurrier at far and clearer at near with glasses off. > Never worry about vision with glasses off. If your corrected (with > bifocals on) vision at near is blurred with the left eye, your last > check up was just a few months ago and the left blur is new since that > check up then you should return to your optometrist to check out > whether the blur is refractive or due to an eye health issue. > Dr Judy |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| TomMonger wrote: - quote - > Hi Dr. Judy,
I'm getting confused now. In your original post you were (I thought)> My last check up was this past Dec. My left eye sees really well far > away, and my right eye is poor. Closeup is the exact opposite. I can > still see well closeup with my right eye, but the left is awful. > Printed text look small and unreadable. I still get by without wearing > glasses (which is most of the time). My eyes do a kind of "natural > monovision", I guess. describing your vision with bifocals on, this post seems to be about vision with glasses off. It is normal for the more myopic eye to be blurrier at far and clearer at near with glasses off. Never worry about vision with glasses off. If your corrected (with bifocals on) vision at near is blurred with the left eye, your last check up was just a few months ago and the left blur is new since that check up then you should return to your optometrist to check out whether the blur is refractive or due to an eye health issue. Dr Judy |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| "TomMonger" <tommonger[at]epix.net> wrote - quote - > I suppose that's possible, especially with presbyopia setting in?
It would be consistent with the average at age 42.But you didn't mention cylinder. - quote - > Maybe I should see an opthamologist?
For a more accurate refraction? ![]() -MT |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I shudder to admit it but I agree with Aceman. When the prescriptions are
I suppose that's possible, especially with presbyopia setting in? I> truly within 0.25, the differences between right and left vision are pretty > subtle. You aren't describing a "subtle" difference here: > > My left eye sees really well far > > away, and my right eye is poor. > > Closeup is the exact opposite. I can > > still see well closeup with my right eye, > > but the left is awful. > So I'd guess your prescription has changed over the past few months, with > the left eye growing _less_ nearsighted, closer to plano (zero). > -MT remember when I had my eyes tested last Dec, I told the DO that, when corrected for distance (without cylinder and axis correction), my left eye was a bit sharper than my right eye. And that my *midrange* was sharper in the right eye than the left eye. He said that my right eye was probably between quarter diopters, where a -1.00 was a bit too strong, so he left it at -.75. Maybe I should see an opthamologist? -Tom in Scranton, PA USA |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| acemanvx[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > Thats really odd youd find such a big difference between -.5 and -.75
Yes, I'm positive about the -.50 and -.75. I'm looking at my> are you sure its correct? How much astigmatism do you have? Give me an > idea of the difference, what is your uncorrected distance vision in > each eye(based on snellen chart) prescription. The astigmatism is supposedly in my left eye only, which is -.50 cyl and 170 axis. I think the doc is wrong about this because he is the first eye DO that has ever prescribed a correction for astigmatism. I have a pair of glasses with the astigmatic correction, and 2 pairs without. I notice no difference whatsoever in the left lenses in any of the glasses. -Tom in Scranton, PA USA |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "TomMonger" <tommonger[at]epix.net - quote - > I'm sorry, Mike, my right eye is -.75 and my left eye is -.50, not -1
I shudder to admit it but I agree with Aceman. When the prescriptions are> and -.75. I screwed up my prescription. truly within 0.25, the differences between right and left vision are pretty subtle. You aren't describing a "subtle" difference here: - quote - > My left eye sees really well far
So I'd guess your prescription has changed over the past few months, with> away, and my right eye is poor. > Closeup is the exact opposite. I can > still see well closeup with my right eye, > but the left is awful. the left eye growing _less_ nearsighted, closer to plano (zero). -MT |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| TomMonger wrote: - quote - > Hi Dr. Judy, > My last check up was this past Dec. My left eye sees really well far > away, and my right eye is poor. Closeup is the exact opposite. I can > still see well closeup with my right eye, but the left is awful. > Printed text look small and unreadable. I still get by without wearing > glasses (which is most of the time). My eyes do a kind of "natural > monovision", I guess. Thats really odd youd find such a big difference between -.5 and -.75 are you sure its correct? How much astigmatism do you have? Give me an idea of the difference, what is your uncorrected distance vision in each eye(based on snellen chart) |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Oh, I wanted to add... when I wear just my distance lenses (night driving, mainly), my closeup vision in my left eye is quite awful, and my right eye sees poorly (like my uncorrected left eye). I also occasionally wear monovision AV2 contacts -- +.50 left and -.75 right. They work pretty well for me, kind of like reverse of how my eyes work without correction. I can see a computer screen really well with the monovision contacts, however, closeup vision in my left eye is better than no lens, but not terrific. I was going to request a +.75 lens from my eye doctor, but I'm afraid it might mess up my midrange and computer vision. I saw some posts about "accommodative spasm" and "accommodative excess". A couple of years ago, someone bought me a "Magic Eye" book of those images that become "3D" when you stare at them long enough. Every time I'd do that, I couldn't see far away for several hours. My eyes felt like they were "locked". I thought I had damaged my eyes somehow! Consequently, I never tried those "Magic Eye" pictures ever again! Could this have something to do with my unusual vision? -Tom in Scranton, PA USA |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Yes, I am more myopic in the right eye, and most of the time I don't wear my bifocals. However, when I don't wear them, all my closeup vision is with my right eye... as my left eye can't see clearly at all. -Tom in Scranton, PA USA acemanvx[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > You are more myopic in the right eye and probably have a bit of > astigmatism too. You can take your glasses off for reading instead of > looking thru the add part, this is what I do, havent even bothered > getting bifocals, I just peak under or take em off. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Hi Dr. Judy, My last check up was this past Dec. My left eye sees really well far away, and my right eye is poor. Closeup is the exact opposite. I can still see well closeup with my right eye, but the left is awful. Printed text look small and unreadable. I still get by without wearing glasses (which is most of the time). My eyes do a kind of "natural monovision", I guess. -Tom in Scranton, PA USA Dr Judy wrote: - quote - > Unbalanced presbyopia is very rare, usually would be associated with a > disease like glaucoma or cataract in the near blurred eye. > More likely (especially if your last prescription check was 2 years > ago) is that your myopia has changed with more myopia now present in > the right eye or less myopia now present in the left eye. > Time for an eye examination. > Dr Judy > > > Thanks, > > -Tom in Scranton, PA USA |
| Tags |
| eye, presbyopia, worse |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Presbyopia Jack: Saw article by Ray Gottlieb, O.D., Ph.D, claimed one can reverse presbyopia using method such as a divergence/convergence and concious control of... | Vision | 43 | 03-11-2006 12:54 AM | |
| presbyopia Eye Question: Prior to lasik I could see clearly to a distance of 3". Now have blurred vision if an object is closer than 6" to the eye. I understand that the... | Vision | 2 | 02-10-2006 04:18 PM | |
| Presbyopia Ed_Zep: Hello. I know it's a seemingly inevitable result of age but does *everyone* get presbyopia? | Vision | 6 | 11-16-2005 03:04 AM | |
| CK procedure for presbyopia kemccx@gmail.com: Looking at these websites re: CK procedure, they refer to the after vision as 'blended vision' as opposed to 'mono-vision'. I find this confusing.... | Vision | 3 | 04-24-2005 03:05 AM | |
| Presbyopia? kayeellen@yahoo.com: ACCK! I am a -2 myope who is having trouble working at my computer. I see ok, but my eyes are very fatigued and get so within an hour. Also, my... | Vision | 7 | 01-27-2005 04:24 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |