On Jul 23, 4:21 pm, "otisbr...[at]pa.net" <otisbr...[at]pa.net> wrote:

- quote -


Otis, please post a single reference that shows that people develop
staircase myopia when minus lenses are used-- even excessive minus
lenses. Don't run and hide again Otis, produce the data.

On Jul 23, 11:37 am, "otisbr...[at]pa.net" <otisbr...[at]pa.net> wrote:
- quote -

there is no such thing as the "majority opinion" versus the "second
opinion".

what the true situation is is "the current state of understanding in
the research community" versus "Otis Brown Engineer's opinion". hell,
even the Batesean wackos have asked you to shut up about "the plus" on
their alternative medicine forum. its actually "Otis Brown Engineer's
opinion" versus everyone else.

Otis, there is NO ONE who believes what you do. you even reply to
your own posts and try to make-up dialog between yourself and others
by cutting and pasting their comments into a single thread that you
fabricate yourself. when anyone tries to have an intellectual
conversation with you you just run because you know you will get your
lunch eaten.

you're really just a lonely pathetic old man Otis. go play some
suffleboard and checkers with some folks in the park and just stay off
the internet.

go take your plus lenses and cure myopia in monkeys and chickens

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:21:07 -0700, "otisbrown[at]pa.net"
<otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote:

- quote -

Well, that doesn't sound quite accurate to me. I suspect that--like
the rest of us--she simply recognizes that YOU are a joke.

- quote -

Sure, but you're a mentally unstable, hateful, hurtful, little man who
never cares if he causes people vision problems.

- quote -

I think she'd be more likely to swear an affidavit that you were,
again, practicing medicine without a license.

- quote -

Even if it DID increase the myopic progression rate -- which it
doesn't -- you wouldn't regret it.

You have no conscience.

Or functioning brain cells.

Sad, really.

On Jul 23, 4:21 pm, "otisbr...[at]pa.net" <otisbr...[at]pa.net> wrote:
- quote -

Is "staircase myopia" anything like "revolving door charge"?

Hallo Otis
how are you?

X-No-Archive:

Well, Layman Neil Brooks, if I had to deal with
"Brainy", (who thinks prevention is a joke), I
would put her into the strongest minus I could find.

That would probably give her 20/10 vision, and
she would be very, very happy, and impressed
with my skill in doing that.

I would regret the stair-case myopia she would develop
LATER -- but then what else could anyone do?


Otis


On Jul 23, 1:36 pm, Neil Brooks <neil0...[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
- quote -

Hallo Otis,
How are you?

See you later.

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:37:46 -0700, "otisbrown[at]pa.net"
<otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote:

- quote -

It's quite possible that Siegfried & Roy endorse it, too, but that
doesn't make it effective, now does it?

- quote -

That is normal. There, I would agree.

That damned "majority-opinion" foolishly continues to use the
scientific method to determine both safety and efficacy.

When those tests fail in humans, they do tend to consider the
hypothesis a failure.

Which (randomized, controlled, human) tests are Young, Leung, and you
looking at to draw your conclusions?

Thanks.

And of course, Dr. Young endorces Steve Leung's
second-opinion, and his preventive work
with the plus:

http://www.geocities.com/otisbrown17268/FAYoung.html

The majority-opinion does not agee, but that
is just normal.



On Jul 22, 10:42 pm, "otisbr...[at]pa.net" <otisbr...[at]pa.net> wrote:
- quote -

On Jul 22, 7:18 pm, "otisbr...[at]pa.net" <otisbr...[at]pa.net> wrote:
- quote -

Funny stuff, Otis. Thank you.