|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Good one Cletis. You've scared the poor gut away. Dawki... it is fine if you read with your glasses off. If you are comfortable with them on, fine, off OK also. You do what you feel best with. dr grant |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:40:34 -0500, "Mike Tyner" <mtyner[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > <otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote
Mike, it could be both. Don't forget.> > I said that the natural eye simply changes its > > refractive STATE in a negative direction if > > you wear a full strength minus ALL THE TIME. > Since they don't, you're either stubbornly ignorant, or you're lying. - quote - > Which is it? > -MT |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| <otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote - quote - > I said that the natural eye simply changes its
Since they don't, you're either stubbornly ignorant, or you're lying.> refractive STATE in a negative direction if > you wear a full strength minus ALL THE TIME. Which is it? -MT |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Dear Scott, Please note that I DID NOT SAY HURT. I said that the natural eye simply changes its refractive STATE in a negative direction if you wear a full strength minus ALL THE TIME. The original poster can read David Guyton's commentary and choose to wear the -2.75 all the time, or simply use it when he deems it necessary. After all, he just asked for was OPINIONS. Otis On Jul 24, 1:06 pm, Scott Seidman <namdiestt...[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > "otisbr...[at]pa.net" <otisbr...[at]pa.net> wrote innews:1185294492.999056.238370[at]q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: > > Majoiry-opinion Judy recommends that you ignore the advice > > of an ophthmologist, and wear your minus glasses all the time. > That's not what she said, of course. She just said it wouldn't hurt his > eyes if he did wear his glasses all the time. > -- > Scott > Reverse name to reply |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| On 24 Jul 2007 17:06:45 GMT, Scott Seidman <namdiesttocs[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > "otisbrown[at]pa.net" <otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote in
Yeah. Otis ... um ... well ... he lies ... almost constantly.> news:1185294492.999056.238370[at]q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: > > Majoiry-opinion Judy recommends that you ignore the advice > > of an ophthmologist, and wear your minus glasses all the time. > That's not what she said, of course. It's rather annoying. - quote - > She just said it wouldn't hurt his > eyes if he did wear his glasses all the time. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "otisbrown[at]pa.net" <otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote in news:1185294492.999056.238370[at]q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: - quote - > Majoiry-opinion Judy recommends that you ignore the advice > of an ophthmologist, and wear your minus glasses all the time. That's not what she said, of course. She just said it wouldn't hurt his eyes if he did wear his glasses all the time. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:28:12 -0700, "otisbrown[at]pa.net" <otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote: - quote - > Dear Friend,
What's Guyton's prescription?> A professor of ophthamology stated that he himself, > takes the minus lens off for all close work How old is Guyton? What are Guyton's accommodative amplitudes? Thanks. - quote - > Judy> Otis will soon weigh in with different advice, ignore him.
You can't read--possibly because you can't see. Judy said that the> Majoiry-opinion Judy recommends that you ignore the advice > of an ophthmologist, and wear your minus glasses all the time. original poster should ignore YOU. She did NOT say that anybody should wear their glasses all the time. You're a liar. - quote - > You can follow the advice of an optometrist or
Or Otis, who is neither, AND quite likely mentally ill.> an ophthamologist. Seriously. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Dear Friend, A professor of ophthamology stated that he himself, takes the minus lens off for all close work Judy> Otis will soon weigh in with different advice, ignore him. Majoiry-opinion Judy recommends that you ignore the advice of an ophthmologist, and wear your minus glasses all the time. You can follow the advice of an optometrist or an ophthamologist. Otis On Jul 23, 8:59 pm, Dr Judy <mpac...[at]rogers.com> wrote: - quote - > On Jul 23, 2:45 pm, dawki...[at]gmail.com wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm a 21 year old male, suffering from myopia and astigmatism. The > > left lens prescription is -2.50 H, and the right one is -2.75 H+. > > I've always removed my glasses when doing close-up work, such as > > reading or studying (and still does) but lately I'm having difficulty > > even seeing so close up. > > My question: is it harmful for my eyes to do the close-up work with my > > glasses on? I presupposed so, but I thought I would see what you guys > > would say. > Think of it this way. With your glasses on, reading is exactly the > same as for people who don't wear glasses. You will accommodate and > converge, with your glasses on, in exactly the same manner as a non > glasses wearer. So is it harmful for the eyes of non glasses wearers > to read? > With your current prescription, anything further away than about 35cm > (16 inches) will be blurry without the glasses. So I'm not surprised > that you are noticing discomfort. > Otis will soon weigh in with different advice, ignore him. > Judy > > Thanks! - Hide quoted text -> - Show quoted text - |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 23, 2:45 pm, dawki...[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Hello,
Think of it this way. With your glasses on, reading is exactly the> I'm a 21 year old male, suffering from myopia and astigmatism. The > left lens prescription is -2.50 H, and the right one is -2.75 H+. > I've always removed my glasses when doing close-up work, such as > reading or studying (and still does) but lately I'm having difficulty > even seeing so close up. > My question: is it harmful for my eyes to do the close-up work with my > glasses on? I presupposed so, but I thought I would see what you guys > would say. same as for people who don't wear glasses. You will accommodate and converge, with your glasses on, in exactly the same manner as a non glasses wearer. So is it harmful for the eyes of non glasses wearers to read? With your current prescription, anything further away than about 35cm (16 inches) will be blurry without the glasses. So I'm not surprised that you are noticing discomfort. Otis will soon weigh in with different advice, ignore him. Judy - quote - > Thanks! ![]() |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:07:24 -0700, "otisbrown[at]pa.net" <otisbrown[at]pa.net> wrote: - quote - > You can believe Neil Brooks, with no qualifications AT ALL,
Did Guyton examine the original poster?> to make recommendations of this nature, or you > can believe David Guyton who is a superior ophthamologist, > and knows what he is talking about. No? Really?? Okay. Thanks. - quote - > But Brooks has no respect of anything -- other than
Oh, Otis. You're such an idiot.> his own opinion. Is Carol inflatable? Does she even exist?? Hard to imagine.... |
| Tags |
| glasses |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Some patients have worse vision with glasses after LASIK than they did before the procedure with glasses lasikbad@yahoo.com: http://www.refractivesource.com/patients/complications/complications.htm "Like any medical procedure, refractive surgery has some inherent risks.... | Lasik Eye Surgery | 1 | 05-09-2007 10:44 PM | |
| Aspheric glasses, blurry off center. Raise optical centers? (was:smaller glasses, blurry off center) Fred Ma: Robert Martellaro wrote: > First check the fit. Have an optician mark the optical centers > horizontally and vertically. The OC should be on the... | Vision | 6 | 11-06-2004 12:59 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |