|
#12
| |||
| |||
| The symptoms can be reduced with the perfect memory of a black period, and immunity of the body is increased when strain present in the mind has departed. |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| In article <1190269938.814675.256630[at]y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> , "Ms.Brainy" <mikabrainy[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Sep 11, 11:22 pm, "Ms.Brainy" <mikabra...[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > I see it as a misleading name for unproven methods of therapy, - quote - > I am writing this with the expectation that this message will be > posted to the same usenet groups. My original message was not about > vegetables, vitamins, herbs, meditation, etc. I love vegetables and > certain herbs (I even grow some of them), and I further believe in > good, balanced and healthy diet. I stay away from junk food (but I > love chocolate, I must admit :-). I don't believe in chyropractic, > with perhaps some very limited exceptions. A good back rub makes people feel better. - quote - > I have nothing against
Perhaps it isn't a cure, but it still helps. I knew somebody who wrote> meditation, but don't believe it can cure real diseases. a book about it: http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&keyw...lness&rh=n%3A2 2%2Ck%3ACoping%20with%20illness&page=1 - quote - > I absolutely
There's no cure for the common cold, but it helps to know how to relieve> don't believe in "psychic surgery", see it as a cruel fraud upon > desperate people. When I have a cold I drink fresh lemon juice with > honey -- it feels good, but has never cured my cold. the symptoms. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 20, 1:55 pm, centitale...[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > On Sep 20, 8:37 am, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
I question the value*. Something we are all doing, ultimately.> > Hi, > > > We have encountered several persistent posters who advocate various > > > "alternative" methods of preventing and/or curing myopia. > > It's not 'alternative'. Where was the 'original' cure, then? > > There is none. So you can't use the word 'alternative'. > > You can only say: cure. Glasses are not a cure, are they? > > Just palliate the symptoms. > "Alternative" is a technical term. A right to the least invasivealternative. It's how it's written in the law. > The problem with the term "cure" is that you cannot guarantee you are > able to rid the body of disease and then not recontract that same > disease or virus/parasite causing disease. One should look at healing > as one does continual maintenance. Extending a life is successfulmedicine. > The truth is, the woman died of cancer immediately following the start > of chemotherapy. Many, many people do. If the statistics show > anything at all -- if we KNOW anything aboutmedicine, it is that > chemotherapy does not work. It's evolved agent orange. New to this > century. Nothing more. > Many of the herbs used inalternative(eastern)medicinehave been > used for thousands of years. They stood and continue to stand tests of > time. Would I use herbs, alone ... in an attempt to battle cancer? > No way. Not at all. I'd use the herbs in combination with hardcore > exercise, the ultimate zapper (a device you'll find online), vitamins, > minerals, amino acids, etc.. Ablation therapy is mainstream and is > the use of electricity in the treatment/killing of tumors so when you > scratch your head and wonder why one would choose electricity over > chemotherapy (by the use of the zapper), ask yourself what you do not > yet currently know before lashing out. > The bottom line? There are many ways to approach disease and I > question of the value of fighting one another on the topic rather than > accepting that there are alternatives and alternatives we have a > constitutional right to. Questioning the value of much of anything we face in the way of medicine. In the way of prolonging our frail, human lives. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 20, 8:37 am, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Hi, > > We have encountered several persistent posters who advocate various > > "alternative" methods of preventing and/or curing myopia. > It's not 'alternative'. Where was the 'original' cure, then? > There is none. So you can't use the word 'alternative'. > You can only say: cure. Glasses are not a cure, are they? > Just palliate the symptoms. "Alternative" is a technical term. A right to the least invasive alternative. It's how it's written in the law. The problem with the term "cure" is that you cannot guarantee you are able to rid the body of disease and then not recontract that same disease or virus/parasite causing disease. One should look at healing as one does continual maintenance. Extending a life is successful medicine. The truth is, the woman died of cancer immediately following the start of chemotherapy. Many, many people do. If the statistics show anything at all -- if we KNOW anything about medicine, it is that chemotherapy does not work. It's evolved agent orange. New to this century. Nothing more. Many of the herbs used in alternative (eastern) medicine have been used for thousands of years. They stood and continue to stand tests of time. Would I use herbs, alone ... in an attempt to battle cancer? No way. Not at all. I'd use the herbs in combination with hardcore exercise, the ultimate zapper (a device you'll find online), vitamins, minerals, amino acids, etc.. Ablation therapy is mainstream and is the use of electricity in the treatment/killing of tumors so when you scratch your head and wonder why one would choose electricity over chemotherapy (by the use of the zapper), ask yourself what you do not yet currently know before lashing out. The bottom line? There are many ways to approach disease and I question of the value of fighting one another on the topic rather than accepting that there are alternatives and alternatives we have a constitutional right to. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Brainy> I see it as a misleading name for unproven methods of therapy, providing hope to those who desperately seek miraculous solutions to their health problems and issues. Otis> Your opinion, of course. Brainy> Once a method is proven effective and safe, it is no longer "alternative" but becomes part of the established medicine. Otis> Many of the "methods" started out as "un-proven". The key word is PROOF, and who exactly determines whether a population of eyes are dynamic or not-dynamic. That is a scientific question, and not a medical question. It is a matter of WHO makes these judgments. Brainy> The popular myth that the medical establishment rejects. Otis> No, you can not reduce a scientific truth -- into a quick-fix for the public in five minutes. And that is your error of judgment. Otis On Sep 11, 10:22 pm, "Ms.Brainy" <mikabra...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I see it as a misleading name for unproven methods of therapy, > providing hope to those who desperately seek miraculous solutions to > their health problems and issues. Once a method is proven effective > and safe, it is no longer "alternative" but becomes part of the > established medicine. > The popular myth that the medical establishment rejects any "new" > theory or therapy is groundless, and the evidence is all around us in > the advances of medicine. New methods of therapy do not threaten > doctors or strip away their source of living. OTC, they have more > options of treatment for their patients. > This is not to say that they all act always in the best interest of > their patient and that no economic considerations are involved. > Nonetheless, as it stands now, "alternative medicine" is in most cases > quackery, exploiting people's ignorance, gullibility and desperation, > and giving them false hopes. > As to "second opinion", normally it is considered a legitimate way of > re-examining diagnosis and proposed treatment. However, our buddy > Otis has hijacked this expression and applied it exclusively to his > alternative quackery. What he calls "second opinion" is not what the > rest of humanity considers as prudent consideration of medical issues. > Some alternative theories, treatments or cures may turn out at some > future time to be safe and effective, after sufficient evidence is > gathered, examined, analyzed and studied with scrutiny. We all will > welcome them when this happens, as we have done many times in the > past. Until then they are mere speculative possibilities. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Sorry. Rishi Giovanni Gatti (Zetsu), Lena102938, and Otis Brown are trolls who haunt s.m.v. Rishi has published, and is trying to sell worthless books. Otis is pathologically dishonest and actually hurts people. Following his advice can induce double vision in those not working closely with an eye doctor. Lena102938 uses anti-eye doctor rhetoric as a substitute for ANY actual information. It seems she now has to wear glasses and has developed a pathological (and ILLOGICAL) resentment toward the industry that "foisted these glasses upon her." You'd do well to ignore them and wait for responses from the caring, compassionate eye doctors who DO also participate in this site. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Hi, - quote - > We have encountered several persistent posters who advocate various
It's not 'alternative'. Where was the 'original' cure, then?> "alternative" methods of preventing and/or curing myopia. There is none. So you can't use the word 'alternative'. You can only say: cure. Glasses are not a cure, are they? Just palliate the symptoms. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In article <1190269938.814675.256630[at]y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> , "Ms.Brainy" <mikabrainy[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > The other friend had a lump in her breast and no money or health
No wonder she died!> insurance. > Finally, when it was a size of an orange, she went to a real doctor, > had a vasectomy, I don't mean to make light of her story, just your retelling. Tragic story--so sad. -- ~RT |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Ms.Brainy" <mikabrainy[at]gmail.com> wrote in news:1189578124.759556.26090 [at]w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: - quote - > I see it as a misleading name for unproven methods of therapy, http://nccam.nih.gov/There is an NIH center for complemetary and alternative medicine-- and thus a mechanism for folks who believe in a particular alternative path to gain credibility. The NIH wants to capture valuable treatment options that might not get the recognition they deserve from the clinical world. Of course, there are plenty of voodoo promoters that claim the government seeks to marginalize them, simply by asking them to prove their voodoo works. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 11, 11:22 pm, "Ms.Brainy" <mikabra...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I see it as a misleading name for unproven methods of therapy,
My original post appeared on sci.med.vision 8 days ago. It was> providing hope to those who desperately seek miraculous solutions to > their health problems and issues. Once a method is proven effective > and safe, it is no longer "alternative" but becomes part of the > established medicine. > The popular myth that the medical establishment rejects any "new" > theory or therapy is groundless, and the evidence is all around us in > the advances of medicine. New methods of therapy do not threaten > doctors or strip away their source of living. OTC, they have more > options of treatment for their patients. > This is not to say that they all act always in the best interest of > their patient and that no economic considerations are involved. > Nonetheless, as it stands now, "alternative medicine" is in most cases > quackery, exploiting people's ignorance, gullibility and desperation, > and giving them false hopes. > As to "second opinion", normally it is considered a legitimate way of > re-examining diagnosis and proposed treatment. However, our buddy > Otis has hijacked this expression and applied it exclusively to his > alternative quackery. What he calls "second opinion" is not what the > rest of humanity considers as prudent consideration of medical issues. > Some alternative theories, treatments or cures may turn out at some > future time to be safe and effective, after sufficient evidence is > gathered, examined, analyzed and studied with scrutiny. We all will > welcome them when this happens, as we have done many times in the > past. Until then they are mere speculative possibilities. directed to the readers of s.m.v., but apparently found its way to some other usenet groups, namely because of the key words "alternative medicine". In response I received a couple of private emails, scolding me and praising the value of herbs and natural substances, as well as chyropractic, meditation, acupuncture, etc. I am writing this with the expectation that this message will be posted to the same usenet groups. My original message was not about vegetables, vitamins, herbs, meditation, etc. I love vegetables and certain herbs (I even grow some of them), and I further believe in good, balanced and healthy diet. I stay away from junk food (but I love chocolate, I must admit :-). I don't believe in chyropractic, with perhaps some very limited exceptions. I have nothing against meditation, but don't believe it can cure real diseases. I absolutely don't believe in "psychic surgery", see it as a cruel fraud upon desperate people. When I have a cold I drink fresh lemon juice with honey -- it feels good, but has never cured my cold. I will not go through the entire list, but will state that my personal view is that leaving the natural state of our bodies in tact is preferred, as long as nature does not betrays us and we have no other choice but to interfere. Non invasive treatment is always better than invasive one, if available and effective. The readers of s.m.v. understood very well what my message was about. We have encountered several persistent posters who advocate various "alternative" methods of preventing and/or curing myopia. None has any supporting evidence, let alone any scientific proof, and furthermore they don't agree with each other, although they are united in their attacks on the established medicine, particularly in the eye- vision field. But since we are at it, I will mention a couple of personal experiences -- not mine, but of people that I know/knew. One good friend of mine is caught up in the "life extension" movement, swallowing huge quantities of food supplements and spending hundreds of thousands of $$$ over the years -- all with the belief that he will live longer, perhaps even hundreds of years, or at least will avoid the aging process and remain young and healthy... He is now in his 60s, still relatively healthy, but shows all the symptoms of other people his age -- presbyopia, arthritis, high blood pressure... He is still in denial, but he has very expensive urine... The other friend had a lump in her breast and no money or health insurance. She went to an alternative "doctor" who gave her herbs and instructed her to quit coffee and certain foods. The lump grew. Finally, when it was a size of an orange, she went to a real doctor, had a vasectomy, was placed on chimotherapy and radiation and died within a short time, 2 days before her 30th birthday, leaving a young son (no father). The magical herbs did not work. With proper medical treatment the rate of survival of breast cancer patients is very high. My friend lost her life to alternative medicine. Sorry, this is off subject. Of course it doesn't mean that all altenative methods of therapy are worthless, but the gist of my post was that if any of them is proven effective and safe, they will become part of the established medicine. I believe this is true about herbs or myopia prevention. |
| Tags |
| alternative medicine, second opinion |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Second-opinion answers to Majority-opinion Questions otisbrown@pa.net: Dear sci.med.vision friends, Subject: The second-opinion answers to the majority-opinion questions raised on sci.med.vision. Research on the... | Vision | 7 | 08-06-2007 02:53 PM | |
| Plus-prevention as the Second-Opinion otisbrown@pa.net: THE TRUTH ABOUT SEEING: GUARDING YOUR CHILD'S VISION Stirling Colgate, Ph.D. Vera F. Rollo, Ph.D. It's not that eye specialists and... | Vision | 8 | 06-01-2006 08:45 PM | |
| Second Opinion. (somewhat long post) Zorak: I had Custom Lasik 7 weeks ago. I realize I am still in the process of healing and that visual fluctuations can be expected. However, during my... | Lasik Eye Surgery | 10 | 10-02-2004 08:59 AM | |
| The Second Opinion by Dr. C. Prentice -- FYI Otis Brown: Chalm3.txt Dear Friends, This was written about 100 years ago. Chalmer Prentice, M.D. may have not got everything right (no one ever... | Vision | 28 | 06-08-2004 05:14 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |