Go Back   Earth Vision Correction > Main Category > Vision

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #12  
Old 09-20-2007, 08:28 PM
Zetsu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What Is "Alternative Medicine" and "Second Opinion"?

The symptoms can be reduced with the perfect memory of a black period,
and immunity of the body is increased when strain present in the mind
has departed.

Alt 09-20-2007, 08:28 PM
LaSalute.net
ads
 
Standard Sponsored links

  #11  
Old 09-20-2007, 07:21 PM
Dan Abel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What Is "Alternative Medicine" and "Second Opinion"?

In article <1190269938.814675.256630[at]y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> ,
"Ms.Brainy" <mikabrainy[at]gmail.com> wrote:

- quote -

> On Sep 11, 11:22 pm, "Ms.Brainy" <mikabra...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > I see it as a misleading name for unproven methods of therapy,



- quote -

> I am writing this with the expectation that this message will be
> posted to the same usenet groups. My original message was not about
> vegetables, vitamins, herbs, meditation, etc. I love vegetables and
> certain herbs (I even grow some of them), and I further believe in
> good, balanced and healthy diet. I stay away from junk food (but I
> love chocolate, I must admit :-). I don't believe in chyropractic,
> with perhaps some very limited exceptions.


A good back rub makes people feel better.


- quote -

> I have nothing against
> meditation, but don't believe it can cure real diseases.

Perhaps it isn't a cure, but it still helps. I knew somebody who wrote
a book about it:

http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&keyw...lness&rh=n%3A2
2%2Ck%3ACoping%20with%20illness&page=1


- quote -

> I absolutely
> don't believe in "psychic surgery", see it as a cruel fraud upon
> desperate people. When I have a cold I drink fresh lemon juice with
> honey -- it feels good, but has never cured my cold.

There's no cure for the common cold, but it helps to know how to relieve
the symptoms.
  #10  
Old 09-20-2007, 06:02 PM
centitalensa@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What Is "Alternative Medicine" and "Second Opinion"?

On Sep 20, 1:55 pm, centitale...[at]gmail.com wrote:
- quote -

> On Sep 20, 8:37 am, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > > We have encountered several persistent posters who advocate various
> > > "alternative" methods of preventing and/or curing myopia.
> > It's not 'alternative'. Where was the 'original' cure, then?
> > There is none. So you can't use the word 'alternative'.
> > You can only say: cure. Glasses are not a cure, are they?
> > Just palliate the symptoms.
> "Alternative" is a technical term. A right to the least invasivealternative. It's how it's written in the law.
> The problem with the term "cure" is that you cannot guarantee you are
> able to rid the body of disease and then not recontract that same
> disease or virus/parasite causing disease. One should look at healing
> as one does continual maintenance. Extending a life is successfulmedicine.
> The truth is, the woman died of cancer immediately following the start
> of chemotherapy. Many, many people do. If the statistics show
> anything at all -- if we KNOW anything aboutmedicine, it is that
> chemotherapy does not work. It's evolved agent orange. New to this
> century. Nothing more.
> Many of the herbs used inalternative(eastern)medicinehave been
> used for thousands of years. They stood and continue to stand tests of
> time. Would I use herbs, alone ... in an attempt to battle cancer?
> No way. Not at all. I'd use the herbs in combination with hardcore
> exercise, the ultimate zapper (a device you'll find online), vitamins,
> minerals, amino acids, etc.. Ablation therapy is mainstream and is
> the use of electricity in the treatment/killing of tumors so when you
> scratch your head and wonder why one would choose electricity over
> chemotherapy (by the use of the zapper), ask yourself what you do not
> yet currently know before lashing out.
> The bottom line? There are many ways to approach disease and I
> question of the value of fighting one another on the topic rather than
> accepting that there are alternatives and alternatives we have a
> constitutional right to.

I question the value*. Something we are all doing, ultimately.
Questioning the value of much of anything we face in the way of
medicine. In the way of prolonging our frail, human lives.


  #9  
Old 09-20-2007, 05:55 PM
centitalensa@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What Is "Alternative Medicine" and "Second Opinion"?

On Sep 20, 8:37 am, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
- quote -

> Hi,
> > We have encountered several persistent posters who advocate various
> > "alternative" methods of preventing and/or curing myopia.
> It's not 'alternative'. Where was the 'original' cure, then?
> There is none. So you can't use the word 'alternative'.
> You can only say: cure. Glasses are not a cure, are they?
> Just palliate the symptoms.



"Alternative" is a technical term. A right to the least invasive
alternative. It's how it's written in the law.


The problem with the term "cure" is that you cannot guarantee you are
able to rid the body of disease and then not recontract that same
disease or virus/parasite causing disease. One should look at healing
as one does continual maintenance. Extending a life is successful
medicine.

The truth is, the woman died of cancer immediately following the start
of chemotherapy. Many, many people do. If the statistics show
anything at all -- if we KNOW anything about medicine, it is that
chemotherapy does not work. It's evolved agent orange. New to this
century. Nothing more.

Many of the herbs used in alternative (eastern) medicine have been
used for thousands of years. They stood and continue to stand tests of
time. Would I use herbs, alone ... in an attempt to battle cancer?
No way. Not at all. I'd use the herbs in combination with hardcore
exercise, the ultimate zapper (a device you'll find online), vitamins,
minerals, amino acids, etc.. Ablation therapy is mainstream and is
the use of electricity in the treatment/killing of tumors so when you
scratch your head and wonder why one would choose electricity over
chemotherapy (by the use of the zapper), ask yourself what you do not
yet currently know before lashing out.

The bottom line? There are many ways to approach disease and I
question of the value of fighting one another on the topic rather than
accepting that there are alternatives and alternatives we have a
constitutional right to.

  #8  
Old 09-20-2007, 03:57 PM
otisbrown@pa.net
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What Is "Alternative Medicine" and "Second Opinion"?




Brainy> I see it as a misleading name for unproven methods of
therapy,
providing hope to those who desperately seek miraculous solutions to
their health problems and issues.

Otis> Your opinion, of course.

Brainy> Once a method is proven effective
and safe, it is no longer "alternative" but becomes part of the
established medicine.

Otis> Many of the "methods" started out as "un-proven".
The key word is PROOF, and who exactly determines whether
a population of eyes are dynamic or not-dynamic. That
is a scientific question, and not a medical question. It
is a matter of WHO makes these judgments.

Brainy> The popular myth that the medical establishment rejects.

Otis> No, you can not reduce a scientific truth -- into
a quick-fix for the public in five minutes. And that is your
error of judgment.

Otis




On Sep 11, 10:22 pm, "Ms.Brainy" <mikabra...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
- quote -

> I see it as a misleading name for unproven methods of therapy,
> providing hope to those who desperately seek miraculous solutions to
> their health problems and issues. Once a method is proven effective
> and safe, it is no longer "alternative" but becomes part of the
> established medicine.
> The popular myth that the medical establishment rejects any "new"
> theory or therapy is groundless, and the evidence is all around us in
> the advances of medicine. New methods of therapy do not threaten
> doctors or strip away their source of living. OTC, they have more
> options of treatment for their patients.
> This is not to say that they all act always in the best interest of
> their patient and that no economic considerations are involved.
> Nonetheless, as it stands now, "alternative medicine" is in most cases
> quackery, exploiting people's ignorance, gullibility and desperation,
> and giving them false hopes.
> As to "second opinion", normally it is considered a legitimate way of
> re-examining diagnosis and proposed treatment. However, our buddy
> Otis has hijacked this expression and applied it exclusively to his
> alternative quackery. What he calls "second opinion" is not what the
> rest of humanity considers as prudent consideration of medical issues.
> Some alternative theories, treatments or cures may turn out at some
> future time to be safe and effective, after sufficient evidence is
> gathered, examined, analyzed and studied with scrutiny. We all will
> welcome them when this happens, as we have done many times in the
> past. Until then they are mere speculative possibilities.


  #7  
Old 09-20-2007, 01:24 PM
Neil Brooks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What Is "Alternative Medicine" and "Second Opinion"?

Sorry. Rishi Giovanni Gatti (Zetsu), Lena102938, and Otis Brown are
trolls who haunt s.m.v.

Rishi has published, and is trying to sell worthless books.

Otis is pathologically dishonest and actually hurts people.
Following his advice can induce double vision in those
not working closely with an eye doctor.

Lena102938 uses anti-eye doctor rhetoric as a substitute for ANY
actual information. It seems she now has to wear glasses and has
developed a pathological (and ILLOGICAL) resentment toward the
industry that "foisted these glasses upon her."

You'd do well to ignore them and wait for responses from the
caring, compassionate eye doctors who DO also participate in this site.

  #6  
Old 09-20-2007, 12:37 PM
Zetsu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What Is "Alternative Medicine" and "Second Opinion"?

Hi,

- quote -

> We have encountered several persistent posters who advocate various
> "alternative" methods of preventing and/or curing myopia.

It's not 'alternative'. Where was the 'original' cure, then?
There is none. So you can't use the word 'alternative'.
You can only say: cure. Glasses are not a cure, are they?
Just palliate the symptoms.

  #5  
Old 09-20-2007, 12:03 PM
RT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What Is "Alternative Medicine" and "Second Opinion"?

In article <1190269938.814675.256630[at]y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> ,
"Ms.Brainy" <mikabrainy[at]gmail.com> wrote:


- quote -

> The other friend had a lump in her breast and no money or health
> insurance.

> Finally, when it was a size of an orange, she went to a real doctor,
> had a vasectomy,

No wonder she died!

I don't mean to make light of her story, just your retelling. Tragic
story--so sad.

--
~RT

  #4  
Old 09-20-2007, 12:00 PM
Scott Seidman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What Is "Alternative Medicine" and "Second Opinion"?

"Ms.Brainy" <mikabrainy[at]gmail.com> wrote in news:1189578124.759556.26090
[at]w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

- quote -

> I see it as a misleading name for unproven methods of therapy,

http://nccam.nih.gov/

There is an NIH center for complemetary and alternative medicine-- and thus
a mechanism for folks who believe in a particular alternative path to gain
credibility. The NIH wants to capture valuable treatment options that
might not get the recognition they deserve from the clinical world.

Of course, there are plenty of voodoo promoters that claim the government
seeks to marginalize them, simply by asking them to prove their voodoo
works.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply
  #3  
Old 09-20-2007, 06:32 AM
Ms.Brainy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: What Is "Alternative Medicine" and "Second Opinion"?

On Sep 11, 11:22 pm, "Ms.Brainy" <mikabra...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
- quote -

> I see it as a misleading name for unproven methods of therapy,
> providing hope to those who desperately seek miraculous solutions to
> their health problems and issues. Once a method is proven effective
> and safe, it is no longer "alternative" but becomes part of the
> established medicine.
> The popular myth that the medical establishment rejects any "new"
> theory or therapy is groundless, and the evidence is all around us in
> the advances of medicine. New methods of therapy do not threaten
> doctors or strip away their source of living. OTC, they have more
> options of treatment for their patients.
> This is not to say that they all act always in the best interest of
> their patient and that no economic considerations are involved.
> Nonetheless, as it stands now, "alternative medicine" is in most cases
> quackery, exploiting people's ignorance, gullibility and desperation,
> and giving them false hopes.
> As to "second opinion", normally it is considered a legitimate way of
> re-examining diagnosis and proposed treatment. However, our buddy
> Otis has hijacked this expression and applied it exclusively to his
> alternative quackery. What he calls "second opinion" is not what the
> rest of humanity considers as prudent consideration of medical issues.
> Some alternative theories, treatments or cures may turn out at some
> future time to be safe and effective, after sufficient evidence is
> gathered, examined, analyzed and studied with scrutiny. We all will
> welcome them when this happens, as we have done many times in the
> past. Until then they are mere speculative possibilities.

My original post appeared on sci.med.vision 8 days ago. It was
directed to the readers of s.m.v., but apparently found its way to
some other usenet groups, namely because of the key words "alternative
medicine". In response I received a couple of private emails,
scolding me and praising the value of herbs and natural substances, as
well as chyropractic, meditation, acupuncture, etc.

I am writing this with the expectation that this message will be
posted to the same usenet groups. My original message was not about
vegetables, vitamins, herbs, meditation, etc. I love vegetables and
certain herbs (I even grow some of them), and I further believe in
good, balanced and healthy diet. I stay away from junk food (but I
love chocolate, I must admit :-). I don't believe in chyropractic,
with perhaps some very limited exceptions. I have nothing against
meditation, but don't believe it can cure real diseases. I absolutely
don't believe in "psychic surgery", see it as a cruel fraud upon
desperate people. When I have a cold I drink fresh lemon juice with
honey -- it feels good, but has never cured my cold.

I will not go through the entire list, but will state that my personal
view is that leaving the natural state of our bodies in tact is
preferred, as long as nature does not betrays us and we have no other
choice but to interfere. Non invasive treatment is always better than
invasive one, if available and effective.

The readers of s.m.v. understood very well what my message was about.
We have encountered several persistent posters who advocate various
"alternative" methods of preventing and/or curing myopia. None has
any supporting evidence, let alone any scientific proof, and
furthermore they don't agree with each other, although they are united
in their attacks on the established medicine, particularly in the eye-
vision field.

But since we are at it, I will mention a couple of personal
experiences -- not mine, but of people that I know/knew.

One good friend of mine is caught up in the "life extension" movement,
swallowing huge quantities of food supplements and spending hundreds
of thousands of $$$ over the years -- all with the belief that he will
live longer, perhaps even hundreds of years, or at least will avoid
the aging process and remain young and healthy... He is now in his
60s, still relatively healthy, but shows all the symptoms of other
people his age -- presbyopia, arthritis, high blood pressure... He is
still in denial, but he has very expensive urine...

The other friend had a lump in her breast and no money or health
insurance. She went to an alternative "doctor" who gave her herbs and
instructed her to quit coffee and certain foods. The lump grew.
Finally, when it was a size of an orange, she went to a real doctor,
had a vasectomy, was placed on chimotherapy and radiation and died
within a short time, 2 days before her 30th birthday, leaving a young
son (no father). The magical herbs did not work. With proper medical
treatment the rate of survival of breast cancer patients is very
high. My friend lost her life to alternative medicine.

Sorry, this is off subject. Of course it doesn't mean that all
altenative methods of therapy are worthless, but the gist of my post
was that if any of them is proven effective and safe, they will become
part of the established medicine. I believe this is true about herbs
or myopia prevention.

 

Tags
alternative medicine, second opinion
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Second-opinion answers to Majority-opinion Questions
otisbrown@pa.net: Dear sci.med.vision friends, Subject: The second-opinion answers to the majority-opinion questions raised on sci.med.vision. Research on the...
Vision 7 08-06-2007 02:53 PM
Plus-prevention as the Second-Opinion
otisbrown@pa.net: THE TRUTH ABOUT SEEING: GUARDING YOUR CHILD'S VISION Stirling Colgate, Ph.D. Vera F. Rollo, Ph.D. It's not that eye specialists and...
Vision 8 06-01-2006 08:45 PM
Second Opinion. (somewhat long post)
Zorak: I had Custom Lasik 7 weeks ago. I realize I am still in the process of healing and that visual fluctuations can be expected. However, during my...
Lasik Eye Surgery 10 10-02-2004 08:59 AM
The Second Opinion by Dr. C. Prentice -- FYI
Otis Brown: Chalm3.txt Dear Friends, This was written about 100 years ago. Chalmer Prentice, M.D. may have not got everything right (no one ever...
Vision 28 06-08-2004 05:14 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:21 PM.