Anyone successfully reverse/eliminate cataracts?

#50 10-19-2007, 04:16 PM

In article <1192542604.305720.320420[at]i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com> ,
Neil Brooks <neil0502[at]yahoo.com> wrote:

- quote -

> On Oct 15, 11:54 pm, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Chemistry is a microscopically small collection of study by humans and

- quote -

> I presume that you're expecting us to believe that the "Well, Science
> doesn't know everything" argument IS PROOF THAT your "rest methods"
> will reverse a cataract?
> Why are you still here?

Typing practice.

#49 10-19-2007, 03:49 PM

In article <i43vg3pu5990rhigapse74bdh62g04n574[at]4ax.com> ,
Neil Brooks <neil0502[at]yahoo.com> wrote:

- quote -

> Bill Stacy wrote:
> > > It's called protein denaturing.

- quote -

> > > If you want the precise chemistry of this process, consult a good text on
> > > organic chemistry. Knock yourself out.
> "Don W" replied:
> > Wonder how many labs are knocking themselves out on this no matter what
> > problem.
> I'd say .... some:

> I'm sure there's BIG $$$ there, though, so ... I'm sure they'll try.

To the extent that presbyopia is due to deterioration of the proteins,
and that the proposed fix regenerates them, we're talking about a
possible cure to presbyopia, which opens up the market even more.

#48 10-19-2007, 03:35 PM

In article <1192260476.181087.137140[at]k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com> ,
Jason Sperry <jasonsperry13[at]gmail.com> wrote:

- quote -

> If I could find an effective fool-proof method to objectively CURE
> myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, strabismus, amblyopia, presbyopia,
> muscae volitantes, scotoma, nyctalopia, cataracts, glaucoma, macular
> degeneration, iritis, uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, retinal
> detachement, macular edema, color blindness, opthalmoparesis,
> opthalmoplegia, keratomycosis, all kinds of retinopathy, sympathetic
> opthalmia, and blindness, and provided careful before and after
> measurements and such (by an objective observer if necessary), would
> there be no doubt that I would win the Nobel Prize?

So a 16 year old untrained young man is going to cure somebody and win
the Nobel prize, using Bates methods? Bates was a trained
opthalmologist, Why didn't *he* win it?

#47 10-17-2007, 08:52 PM

- quote -

> Please take a good look at the original posters questions. He wanted
> info from those who have actually, themselves, reversed their cataract

What about his eighth question: "8) Could you give me advise as I try
to reverse and hopefully eliminate my cataracts?" - the original
poster wants advice too.

#46 10-17-2007, 03:30 PM

- quote -

> Unless you can actually answer the original poster's questions from
> personal experience, I suggest you sit on your hands.

Then why are your hands still typing and posting in this thread?

#45 10-17-2007, 03:28 PM

This thread was already dead when I picked it up; I wasn't harming
anything. If I hadn't posted this thread would have disappeared from
the sci.med.vision thread viewing list anyway; it seemed that no one
else had anything more to say about cataract reversing. Instead of
blaming other people and complaining about having to 'wade through'
posts, why don't you just kill file me and Jason and be silent and
happy with it? No one is forcing you to read anything on the internet;
that is the beauty of it.

#44 10-17-2007, 01:12 PM

On Oct 11, 2:34 pm, Mark <mkhueb...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
- quote -

> I would like to get advise from people that have had success in
> reversing their "doctor diagnosed" cataracts. I would like to know
> the following:
> 1) Was your cataract in the beginning, intermediate, or advanced
> stage? How bad did your vision get?
> 2) Was your cataract diagnosed by an eye doctor? What type of
> cataract did they say it was (nuclear, cortical, subcapsular, ...)?
> 3) How much time elapsed after your cataract was discovered by your
> doctor before you started taking supplements and/or herbs and/or
> drugs?
> 4) What did you take that worked (e.g., Eyebright, Billberry, Vitamin
> E, ...)? How much of it did you take? How many times per day? For
> how many days or months?
> 5) Was the cataract reversed or eliminated completely? If reversed,
> by how much?
> 6) Did your cataract reoccur or get worse again after you stopped
> taking the supplements/herbs/drugs?
> 7) What country do you live in?
> 8) Could you give me advise as I try to reverse and hopefully
> eliminate my cataracts? If so, how can I contact you?

This thread is typical of the garbage one has to wade through now on
sci.med.vision.

Please take a good look at the original posters questions. He wanted
info from those who have actually, themselves, reversed their cataract
without surgery.

So far the only post that comes close to answering his question is
that from someone whose dog may have recovered (though there was also
concurrent corneal disease in the dog and the drugs used were to
address the corneal problem).

All the other posts have been declarations that cataract reversal is
impossible, declarations that it is totally possible by someone who
has not done it or even knows someone who has done it, and
declarations that someone is planning to try it but hasn't done it yet
and doesn't yet know what therapy he will try.

Unless you can actually answer the original poster's questions from
personal experience, I suggest you sit on your hands.

Judy

#43 10-16-2007, 06:32 PM

I do not fathom to give a crap about what journalist tell me,
Brooks.Especially not Ms Brainy. I think that The news writers are
full of lies and deceit and filth and a source of corruption you see.
Now why not you go and dribble over the new Spiderman 3 movie; then
you can learn some more things that seem wise and clever.

#42 10-16-2007, 06:26 PM

I don't give a crap about what journalists think, Brooks.

Least of all, Ms.Brainy.

#41 10-16-2007, 03:18 PM

On Oct 16, 7:57 am, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
- quote -

> No, I am expecting you to demonstrate the fact for yourself if you
> desire proof. And yes I know that something cannot be proved by
> negative preposition, I don't need a lecture from the likes of you
> Brooks.

It seems abundantly clear, to any and all rational participants of
this forum, that you DO need such a lecture from somebody.

As to "free country:" as journalists will tell you ... WITH rights
like free speech come profound responsibilities. You (and Otis and
Lena) seem to ignore that part.

Similar Threads
Thread	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Re: Nearsighedness successfully prevented? Snellen used. Mike Tyner: "Otis Brown" <otisbrown@pa.net> wrote in message > Opinions vary about the "preventability" of a negative > focal state of the eye. > Here is...	Vision	35	09-02-2003 05:45 AM
Re: Nearsighedness successfully prevented? Snellen used. Mike Tyner: "Edward" <a@b.com> wrote in message > > Dr. W. B., Ophthalmologist > > Reference properly, please. What is the book,...	Main Category	1	08-21-2003 09:00 PM
Re: Nearsighedness successfully prevented? Snellen used. Mike Tyner: "Edward" <a@b.com> wrote in message > > Dr. W. B., Ophthalmologist > > Reference properly, please. What is the book,...	Vision	1	08-21-2003 09:00 PM

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode