> On Jan 25, 11:05 am, BD <robert.d...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > "Proving was a jerk his" ~ "All your base are belong to us" ~ "Someone
> > set up us the bomb..."
> In all fairness, though, Bobby, if Otis didn't "was a jerk his" so
> much in his youth, he might not BE a -6.00d myope now ;-)

> "Proving was a jerk his" ~ "All your base are belong to us" ~ "Someone
> set up us the bomb..."

> I asked you a question. *He interrupted twice -- proving
> was a jerk his.

> Dear Zetsu,
> Subject: Polite conversations -- and respect for it.
> I like your insights about "Ophthalmology".
> I also like your reflections on the chaos that is sci.med.vision.
> You will notice that ONE troll on sci.med.vision.
> I asked you a question. He interrupted twice -- proving
> was a jerk his.
> No one else did.
> Further, this troll is profoundly ignorant and negative. He has
> NOTHING
> POSITIVE TO ADD -- at all.

> On Jan 24, 10:56*am, Zetsu <Kyazek...[at]googlemail.com> wrote:
> > The following is a tale I decided to write about sci.med.vision since
> > I am bored today.
> > Once upon a time a man saw that the ophthalmologist field was an
> > interesting one. He decided that he ought to come into the career.
> > Later in life, he thought, wouldn't it be good if we could all come to
> > one place and discuss matters of this study and to share our ideas.
> > So, he saw a place called 'internet' and said: this looks like a good
> > place where we can talk. So he made the newsgroup, and saw that it was
> > good. The group was soon flourishing and the best doctors from around
> > the world came to talk about their own ideas.
> > But soon the group was plunged into hell. For a new shroud had come
> > over the clouds, unbeknownst to the members. Anyway, soon the members
> > were discouraged to see that the quality of posting had degraded into
> > flaming others where valuable information had once circulated and
> > prevailed. Some of the members left the group in their anguish. Thus
> > began the 'dark ages'.
> > After many years the group was near to seeing the light, for a number
> > of special individuals had came with a new level of thought, known as
> > Batesians. However the light was shortlived, and the group degraded
> > back into the previous state of war and destruction.
> > Anyway, that was fun writing loll
> Yes. I chuckled when I read it.- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -

> The following is a tale I decided to write about sci.med.vision since
> I am bored today.
> Once upon a time a man saw that the ophthalmologist field was an
> interesting one. He decided that he ought to come into the career.
> Later in life, he thought, wouldn't it be good if we could all come to
> one place and discuss matters of this study and to share our ideas.
> So, he saw a place called 'internet' and said: this looks like a good
> place where we can talk. So he made the newsgroup, and saw that it was
> good. The group was soon flourishing and the best doctors from around
> the world came to talk about their own ideas.
> But soon the group was plunged into hell. For a new shroud had come
> over the clouds, unbeknownst to the members. Anyway, soon the members
> were discouraged to see that the quality of posting had degraded into
> flaming others where valuable information had once circulated and
> prevailed. Some of the members left the group in their anguish. Thus
> began the 'dark ages'.
> After many years the group was near to seeing the light, for a number
> of special individuals had came with a new level of thought, known as
> Batesians. However the light was shortlived, and the group degraded
> back into the previous state of war and destruction.
> Anyway, that was fun writing loll