|
#21
| |||
| |||
| In article <8a422971017da[at]uwe> , "MsBrainy via MedKB.com" <u33689[at]uwewrote: - quote - > Lighten up Mark. It has been boring here since the mysterious disappearance
Good to know that you're there to take their place. Well done, with your> of Zetsu and the diminishing quantity of Otis' posts. "well established fact." You fit right in. -- ~RT |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| I'll tell you who has NO sense of humor ... when it comes to optical wear. It's the Constitution Pary and Green Party candidates. I mean ... come ON! [felt like I had to add something....] |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| "Salmon Egg" <SalmonEgg[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:SalmonEgg-Issues, issues, ISSUES! Does any voter give a sh** about issues? That is - quote - > why both major candidates are talking about them in a TRULY SERIOUS way.
Why should candidates talk about issues when voters only want to talk about> Bill the fact that a woman candidate has more than one pair of glasses? |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| In article <P%bAk.34272$Ep1.21898[at]bignews2.bellsouth.net> , "Mark A" <someone[at]someone.com> wrote: - quote - > "MsBrainy via MedKB.com" <u33689[at]uwe> wrote in message
Issues, issues, ISSUES! Does any voter give a sh** about issues? That is> news:8a56baeb85a4e[at]uwe... > > .. and Mark A's angry posts are a good example (and evidence) of your > > statement :-) He never even recognized what was obvious to others -- that > > my > > OP was done with the intention of being humorous. > > MsBrainy > It was done as cheap sexist attack that could only come from another female. > Now I suppose that you are going to tell me that: > 1. It is unusual for women (who can afford it) to have more than one pair of > glasses, and/or > 2. That it is a complete coincidence that you are will not be voting for her > this fall. > I am sure that you think it is humorous to make ad hominem attacks upon > people you have political differences with, but perhaps it would be more > fruitful to criticize her on the issues instead. But something tells me that > is beyond your intellectual ability. > It is little wonder that Hilary didn't get the Presidential or VP nomination > form the Democrats. why both major candidates are talking about them in a TRULY SERIOUS way. Bill -- Private Profit; Public Poop |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| In article <31f2d4hq26sc497eqcp5vj51ustg92r10r[at]4ax.com> , Mike Ruskai <BUTthannydI[at]DONTearthlinkLIKE.netSPAM> wrote: - quote - > On or about Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:56:54 -0700 (PDT) did "Ms.Brainy"
If that is the case why is Little Bush often referred to as a joke?> <mikabrainy[at]gmail.com> dribble thusly: > > Well, now I have another question: Are there any republicans here > > with some sense of humor? > I'm not sure that's logically possible. To be a Republican requires shutting > down so many parts of the brain that a sense of humor is, tragically, a victim > of collateral damage. Bill -- Private Profit; Public Poop |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| "MsBrainy via MedKB.com" <u33689[at]uwe> wrote in message news:8a56baeb85a4e[at]uwe... - quote - > .. and Mark A's angry posts are a good example (and evidence) of your
It was done as cheap sexist attack that could only come from another female.> statement :-) He never even recognized what was obvious to others -- that > my > OP was done with the intention of being humorous. > MsBrainy Now I suppose that you are going to tell me that: 1. It is unusual for women (who can afford it) to have more than one pair of glasses, and/or 2. That it is a complete coincidence that you are will not be voting for her this fall. I am sure that you think it is humorous to make ad hominem attacks upon people you have political differences with, but perhaps it would be more fruitful to criticize her on the issues instead. But something tells me that is beyond your intellectual ability. It is little wonder that Hilary didn't get the Presidential or VP nomination form the Democrats. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Mike Ruskai wrote: - quote - > > Well, now I have another question: Are there any republicans here
... and Mark A's angry posts are a good example (and evidence) of your> > with some sense of humor? > I'm not sure that's logically possible. To be a Republican requires shutting > down so many parts of the brain that a sense of humor is, tragically, a victim > of collateral damage. statement :-) He never even recognized what was obvious to others -- that my OP was done with the intention of being humorous. -- MsBrainy Message posted via http://www.medkb.com |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| On or about Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:56:54 -0700 (PDT) did "Ms.Brainy" <mikabrainy[at]gmail.com> dribble thusly: - quote - > Well, now I have another question: Are there any republicans here
I'm not sure that's logically possible. To be a Republican requires shutting> with some sense of humor? down so many parts of the brain that a sense of humor is, tragically, a victim of collateral damage. -- - Mike Ignore the Python in me to send e-mail. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > "Ms.Brainy" <mikabrainy[at]gmail.com> wrote in message
Give me a break and don't insult my intelligence.> news:19bfc4d4-be0b-47a4-8333-08fdce5875e5[at]25g2000prz.googlegroups.com... > Just to make it clear, I expressed no opinion or criticism about Sarah > or her multiple glasses. I simply asked a question, which nobody has > answered yet, including spammer (my question was as to HOW MANY she, > or anybody in her position, NEEDS, not how many she WANTS). - quote - > Well, now I have another question: Are there any republicans here
It wasn't meant as humor, so why should anyone take it that way.> with some sense of humor? Please don't lie any more. It makes you look worse than you already are. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 16, 8:41*pm, "Mark A" <some...[at]someone.com> wrote: - quote - > > <p.clar...[at]gmail.com> wrote in message
Just to make it clear, I expressed no opinion or criticism about Sarah> > news:ad24933e-6894-4965-b708-d0fa577ea5af[at]y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com.... > > the "left" has not made such an allegation. *it seems to be that you > > are biased toward the "right" and thus likely are an opinionated > > McCane supporter. > So are you claiming that the person who made the initial post about Palin's > multiple pair of glasses is a McCain supporter? *I think it is fairly safe > to day they are not, and they are on the "left" of the political spectrum.. or her multiple glasses. I simply asked a question, which nobody has answered yet, including spammer (my question was as to HOW MANY she, or anybody in her position, NEEDS, not how many she WANTS). Well, now I have another question: Are there any republicans here with some sense of humor? |