|
#7
| |||
| |||
| On Oct 23, 4:22*pm, dumbstruck <dumbst...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Oct 23, 3:36*am, "Mike Tyner" <mty...[at]mindspring.com> wrote:
How to Make Money using PayPal? How to make extra PayPal as seen> > "dumbstruck" <dumbst...[at]gmail.com> wrote > > > This really surprises and pleases me, and I thought I would speculate > > > on why it happened. I think it was accidental vision therapy > > Why would you invent an imaginary process to explain such a common > > occurrance? > That is common? It certainly hasn't been for me, after a long life of > backsliding or stable SPH. I AM being a little teasing about the > recent situation which I don't pretend to understand. > But the earlier situation could only be attributed to vision therapy > with a high degree of certainty by any unbiased observer. There was a > sudden death spiral of SPH that exactly coincided with intense near > point work over a couple years. This was addressed with V.T. with > frequent eye exams where I have graphed the rebounding results, which > were able to persist during later nearpoint work. > I graph SPH and CYL over decades of many eye exams, and have never > seen SPH otherwise go down until now. Do you expect it to suddenly > drop randomly or for some specific reason, when it never has for me > before except in emergency VT? I hadn't honestly thought vision > therapy would do much good for someone whose vision had been stable > for a while vs. backsliding, but what else? on Oprah? EARN EXTRA MONEY IN PAYPAL money in AS SEEN ON OPRAH AND 20/20 Dear Friend, You probably have seen these, but they really do work, give it a try -- think of how you waste $6 in a day, week or month. It's a minor investment with great rewards. This might really help you pay off those credit cards and give you the ability to move out. If you could start your own mail order list with an investment of $6.00, and make $800,000 over the next year would you do it? ***Proven by various, highly-respected U.S. TV and Radio programs as being 100% legal, feasible and true. Oprah Winfrey and ABC's investigation team 20/20 also prove it can be done.*** IF A 15 YEAR OLD BOY COULD MAKE $71,000 IN JUST 5 WEEKS AND OTHERS $250,000 IN A FEW MORE WEEKS -- SO CAN YOU!!! Would you like to make $71,000 OR $250,000 in a few weeks? As seen on the Oprah Winfrey show and ABC's 20/20 The true story that has everyone talking: Parents of a 15yr old boy find $71,000 in his closet: You may have seen this story featured on a number of major news programs (United States), and reported elsewhere around the world. His mother was doing some cleaning and putting some laundry away when she discovered a large brown paper bag that was suspiciously buried beneath some clothes and a skateboard in the back of her 15-year-old sons closet. Nothing could have prepared her for the shock she got when she opened the bag and found that it was full of dollar bills -- $71,000 to be precise!! "My first thought was that he had robbed a bank", says the 41-year-old woman, "There was over $71,000 in that bag, that's more than my husband earns in a year". The woman immediately called her husband at the car-dealership where he worked to tell him what she had discovered. He came home right away and together they drove to the boys school and picked him up. Little did they suspect that where the bills were coming from was going to be a bigger surprise than actually finding them in the closet? As it turns out, the boy had been sending out, via E-mail, a type of "Report" to other E-mail addresses that he obtained off the Internet. Every day after school for the past 2 months, he had been doing this on his computer in his bedroom. "I just got an E-mail one day and I figured what the heck, I put my name on it like the instructions said and I started sending it out", says the 15-year-old. The E-mail letter he received had 5 names and addresses listed on it and contained instructions on how to send one $5 dollar bill to each person on the list. Then delete the name and address at the bottom of the list (Report # 5) and move the other 4 names and addresses down one step, finally add It's true. The boy legitimately earned $71,000. You should print this, read it and read it again and again if necessary. Then follow the simple instructions. You too could make $71,000 and much much more. Here are the 4 easy steps to success: STEP 1: Take a few minutes to join PayPal: Remember to verify your account. www.paypal.com The Internet's most trusted Internet banking system for your future income. When creating your PayPal account make email address you used for PayPal on the list below so people can send money to your account. STEP 2: Once you have a PayPal account running, use PayPal to post $1 to EACH of the 6 Email Addresses below because you pay people with an email address in PayPal. Select "SEND MONEY". To do this you may need to use a credit or debit card, which is very easy, and secure so nobody but PayPal may see it. What you are doing is creating a service. This is absolutely legal! You are requesting a legitimate service and you are paying for it! Here are the 6 individual Email addresses that you have to send $1 to through PayPal for this to work properly and for you to receive money. (If you don't send the money and decide to post the message with your name in it anyway, PayPal will instantly pick this up and terminate your account, immediately, besides the other penalties!!) If you did this you could get into serious trouble because it is fraud. (So follow the instructions and post the $6 and you will make lots of money with no hassles.) Now Send $1.00 to each of the six people on the list using PayPal, and in the comment (Subject) section type "Please add me to your list". Below are the emails that you transfer the money into: These groups of email addresses are PayPal IDs or usernames. Choose what group of email addresses you what to Send 1 Dollar : 1. bigmillzz[at]zoomtown.com 2. aimee011497[at]yahoo.com 3. codey6002[at]yahoo.com 4. tinkerbell85121[at]aol.com 5. wiebusch05[at]aol.com 6. tarkneeka_bivens[at]yahoo.com STEP 3: Now after sending $1.00 to each of the email placements above, take the #1 Email Address off the list, move the other Email Addresses up (6 becomes 5, 5 becomes 4, etc.) and add Your Email Address as number 6 on the list. STEP 4: Change anything you need to, but try to keep this article as close to the original as possible. Now, post your amended article to at least 200 news groups (there are thousands of groups). And email your message to as many people you can. Remember, the more you post and email the more money you make! This is perfectly legal! You are getting paid for a service, the sender of the money asks you to Please add me to your list, Therefore it is legal. Remember to send a dollar to the above names or this is considered illegal. HOW TO POST TO NEWS GROUPS: Use the internet and searching for various news groups, ad posting websites, on-line forums, message boards, chat sites, discussions. Log on any search engine like yahoo.com, google.com, altavista.com, excite.com, etc., then search with the subject "money making message board" or "classified ads" You will find thousands and thousands of message boards and companies like Adblaster.com, InetGiant. com, LiveDeal.com, Adsubmitter.com etc=85 Click on them one by one and you will find the option ''post a new message''. Then Post this article as a ''new message'' by highlighting the text of this letter and selecting copy then paste from the edit menu. Fill in the Subject, this will be the header that everyone sees as they scroll through the list of postings in a particular group, click the post message button. You can also read other peoples ads for business opportunities and respond to their email address with this business opportunity. You're done with your first one! It only takes about 60 seconds to complete postings on message boards after you catch on. REMEMBER, THE MORE NEWS GROUPS YOU POST IN, THE MORE MONEY YOU WILL MAKE!! But you have to post a minimum of 200! How does it work? Step10 When you post 200 letters, it is estimated that at least 15 people will respond and send you $1 ($15). Those 15 will post 200 letters each and 225 will send $1 ($225). Those 225 will post 200 letters each and 3,375 people will send you $1 ($3,375). Those 3,375 people will post 200 letters each and 50,625 people will send you $1 (50,625). Those 50,625 will post 200 letters each and 749,375 people will send you $1 (749,375). At this point your name drops off the list, but so far, you have received $813,615.00. With an investment of only $6.00!! A - M - A - Z - I - N - G - !! When your name is no longer on the list, you just take the latest posting in the news groups, and send out another $6.00 to Email Addresses using PayPal on the list, putting your name at number 6 again. |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Oct 23, 6:36*am, "Mike Tyner" <mty...[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > "dumbstruck" <dumbst...[at]gmail.com> wrote
How to Make Money using PayPal? How to make extra PayPal as seen> > This really surprises and pleases me, and I thought I would speculate > > on why it happened. I think it was accidental vision therapy > Why would you invent an imaginary process to explain such a common > occurrance? > -MT on Oprah? EARN EXTRA MONEY IN PAYPAL money in AS SEEN ON OPRAH AND 20/20 Dear Friend, You probably have seen these, but they really do work, give it a try -- think of how you waste $6 in a day, week or month. It's a minor investment with great rewards. This might really help you pay off those credit cards and give you the ability to move out. If you could start your own mail order list with an investment of $6.00, and make $800,000 over the next year would you do it? ***Proven by various, highly-respected U.S. TV and Radio programs as being 100% legal, feasible and true. Oprah Winfrey and ABC's investigation team 20/20 also prove it can be done.*** IF A 15 YEAR OLD BOY COULD MAKE $71,000 IN JUST 5 WEEKS AND OTHERS $250,000 IN A FEW MORE WEEKS -- SO CAN YOU!!! Would you like to make $71,000 OR $250,000 in a few weeks? As seen on the Oprah Winfrey show and ABC's 20/20 The true story that has everyone talking: Parents of a 15yr old boy find $71,000 in his closet: You may have seen this story featured on a number of major news programs (United States), and reported elsewhere around the world. His mother was doing some cleaning and putting some laundry away when she discovered a large brown paper bag that was suspiciously buried beneath some clothes and a skateboard in the back of her 15-year-old sons closet. Nothing could have prepared her for the shock she got when she opened the bag and found that it was full of dollar bills -- $71,000 to be precise!! "My first thought was that he had robbed a bank", says the 41-year-old woman, "There was over $71,000 in that bag, that's more than my husband earns in a year". The woman immediately called her husband at the car-dealership where he worked to tell him what she had discovered. He came home right away and together they drove to the boys school and picked him up. Little did they suspect that where the bills were coming from was going to be a bigger surprise than actually finding them in the closet? As it turns out, the boy had been sending out, via E-mail, a type of "Report" to other E-mail addresses that he obtained off the Internet. Every day after school for the past 2 months, he had been doing this on his computer in his bedroom. "I just got an E-mail one day and I figured what the heck, I put my name on it like the instructions said and I started sending it out", says the 15-year-old. The E-mail letter he received had 5 names and addresses listed on it and contained instructions on how to send one $5 dollar bill to each person on the list. Then delete the name and address at the bottom of the list (Report # 5) and move the other 4 names and addresses down one step, finally add It's true. The boy legitimately earned $71,000. You should print this, read it and read it again and again if necessary. Then follow the simple instructions. You too could make $71,000 and much much more. Here are the 4 easy steps to success: STEP 1: Take a few minutes to join PayPal: Remember to verify your account. www.paypal.com The Internet's most trusted Internet banking system for your future income. When creating your PayPal account make email address you used for PayPal on the list below so people can send money to your account. STEP 2: Once you have a PayPal account running, use PayPal to post $1 to EACH of the 6 Email Addresses below because you pay people with an email address in PayPal. Select "SEND MONEY". To do this you may need to use a credit or debit card, which is very easy, and secure so nobody but PayPal may see it. What you are doing is creating a service. This is absolutely legal! You are requesting a legitimate service and you are paying for it! Here are the 6 individual Email addresses that you have to send $1 to through PayPal for this to work properly and for you to receive money. (If you don't send the money and decide to post the message with your name in it anyway, PayPal will instantly pick this up and terminate your account, immediately, besides the other penalties!!) If you did this you could get into serious trouble because it is fraud. (So follow the instructions and post the $6 and you will make lots of money with no hassles.) Now Send $1.00 to each of the six people on the list using PayPal, and in the comment (Subject) section type "Please add me to your list". Below are the emails that you transfer the money into: These groups of email addresses are PayPal IDs or usernames. Choose what group of email addresses you what to Send 1 Dollar : 1. bigmillzz[at]zoomtown.com 2. aimee011497[at]yahoo.com 3. codey6002[at]yahoo.com 4. tinkerbell85121[at]aol.com 5. wiebusch05[at]aol.com 6. tarkneeka_bivens[at]yahoo.com STEP 3: Now after sending $1.00 to each of the email placements above, take the #1 Email Address off the list, move the other Email Addresses up (6 becomes 5, 5 becomes 4, etc.) and add Your Email Address as number 6 on the list. STEP 4: Change anything you need to, but try to keep this article as close to the original as possible. Now, post your amended article to at least 200 news groups (there are thousands of groups). And email your message to as many people you can. Remember, the more you post and email the more money you make! This is perfectly legal! You are getting paid for a service, the sender of the money asks you to Please add me to your list, Therefore it is legal. Remember to send a dollar to the above names or this is considered illegal. HOW TO POST TO NEWS GROUPS: Use the internet and searching for various news groups, ad posting websites, on-line forums, message boards, chat sites, discussions. Log on any search engine like yahoo.com, google.com, altavista.com, excite.com, etc., then search with the subject "money making message board" or "classified ads" You will find thousands and thousands of message boards and companies like Adblaster.com, InetGiant. com, LiveDeal.com, Adsubmitter.com etc=85 Click on them one by one and you will find the option ''post a new message''. Then Post this article as a ''new message'' by highlighting the text of this letter and selecting copy then paste from the edit menu. Fill in the Subject, this will be the header that everyone sees as they scroll through the list of postings in a particular group, click the post message button. You can also read other peoples ads for business opportunities and respond to their email address with this business opportunity. You're done with your first one! It only takes about 60 seconds to complete postings on message boards after you catch on. REMEMBER, THE MORE NEWS GROUPS YOU POST IN, THE MORE MONEY YOU WILL MAKE!! But you have to post a minimum of 200! How does it work? Step10 When you post 200 letters, it is estimated that at least 15 people will respond and send you $1 ($15). Those 15 will post 200 letters each and 225 will send $1 ($225). Those 225 will post 200 letters each and 3,375 people will send you $1 ($3,375). Those 3,375 people will post 200 letters each and 50,625 people will send you $1 (50,625). Those 50,625 will post 200 letters each and 749,375 people will send you $1 (749,375). At this point your name drops off the list, but so far, you have received $813,615.00. With an investment of only $6.00!! A - M - A - Z - I - N - G - !! When your name is no longer on the list, you just take the latest posting in the news groups, and send out another $6.00 to Email Addresses using PayPal on the list, putting your name at number 6 again. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Oct 24, 1:16*pm, otisbr...[at]embarqmail.com wrote: - quote - > Dear Dumbstruck,
keep reading and rereading that Snellen. its almost guaranteed to> I am dumbfounded that you did not read your Snellen. > Why not click here, and then on "Display" several times. > http://www.smbs.buffalo.edu/oph/ped/IVAC/IVAC.html > Then back up by 20 feet and determine which line you can > read 1/2 the letters correctly. > The letters are indeed "radom" so you should gat an accurate > and objective visual acuity measurement. > Best, > On Oct 22, 10:25*pm, dumbstruck <dumbst...[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > I just had a .75 to 1.0 reduction in my nearsightedness prescribed > > (from around -2.5 to a smaller absolute number), and boy do the > > resulting glasses give me sharp vision. Partly due to being thinner, > > although they did have to increase the cyl by about half a diopter > > (boo). > > This really surprises and pleases me, and I thought I would speculate > > on why it happened. I think it was accidental vision therapy thru > > stress relieving lenses. I don't expect anyone to agree, because it > > was poorly received here when I recounted a much earlier reduction > > thru formal vision therapy, although that was more a reversal of a > > rapid freefall of nearsightedness. > > The only other explanation that comes to mind is PVDetachment stirring > > up the mix, which I hear can destabilize your prescription. But would > > it have similar effects to both eyes, in both sph and cyl? Would it > > result in me evolving to match the exact prescription of my reduced > > SPH "therapy" glasses?! > > To make this even more provocative, I propose the catalyst was a big > > high def TV, which I think congress should make medically tax > > deductable (grin). I watch with stress relieving glasses due to > > knowing from experience that less SPH is needed based on the distance > > (and more comfortable). I also knew if you undercorrect just a tad for > > any given distance, this seems to "tease" my eye muscles into relaxing > > which brings it into focus. This muscle spasm issue was diagnosed on > > me by an eyedoc, and may not be the root of other folks n.s. problems. > > However this was out of mind... I had seemed stable SPHwise for years > > and thought any improvement was just a part of history for me. *I > > happened to start watching a really ultrasharp top of the line big TV > > for the last couple months. I just couldn't believe the visual clarity > > and for example half hour travel shows took an hour for me to view, > > with constant pausing and backing up even on shows I had already seen > > for sights I had seen in person. Could count the bristles of a > > mustache or a pine tree. (BTW you should reset most tuning parameters > > of big TV's, which are shamelessly tweaked to look good in a bright > > flourescent showroom). > > So I was viewing what was more vivid and interesting than "reality", > > with stress relieving glasses. Then was prescribed the same sph for > > "real life". What else could it be besides HDTV + undercorrection, > > although wonder whats going on about the cyl degradation? improved your results on an acuity test when you test yourself the next time. wonder why? hey, I wonder if I recite my Portugese vocabulary words over and over again if I'll score better on my vocabulary test? Otis, you are an idiot. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Dear Dumbstruck, I am dumbfounded that you did not read your Snellen. Why not click here, and then on "Display" several times. http://www.smbs.buffalo.edu/oph/ped/IVAC/IVAC.html Then back up by 20 feet and determine which line you can read 1/2 the letters correctly. The letters are indeed "radom" so you should gat an accurate and objective visual acuity measurement. Best, On Oct 22, 10:25*pm, dumbstruck <dumbst...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I just had a .75 to 1.0 reduction in my nearsightedness prescribed > (from around -2.5 to a smaller absolute number), and boy do the > resulting glasses give me sharp vision. Partly due to being thinner, > although they did have to increase the cyl by about half a diopter > (boo). > This really surprises and pleases me, and I thought I would speculate > on why it happened. I think it was accidental vision therapy thru > stress relieving lenses. I don't expect anyone to agree, because it > was poorly received here when I recounted a much earlier reduction > thru formal vision therapy, although that was more a reversal of a > rapid freefall of nearsightedness. > The only other explanation that comes to mind is PVDetachment stirring > up the mix, which I hear can destabilize your prescription. But would > it have similar effects to both eyes, in both sph and cyl? Would it > result in me evolving to match the exact prescription of my reduced > SPH "therapy" glasses?! > To make this even more provocative, I propose the catalyst was a big > high def TV, which I think congress should make medically tax > deductable (grin). I watch with stress relieving glasses due to > knowing from experience that less SPH is needed based on the distance > (and more comfortable). I also knew if you undercorrect just a tad for > any given distance, this seems to "tease" my eye muscles into relaxing > which brings it into focus. This muscle spasm issue was diagnosed on > me by an eyedoc, and may not be the root of other folks n.s. problems. > However this was out of mind... I had seemed stable SPHwise for years > and thought any improvement was just a part of history for me. *I > happened to start watching a really ultrasharp top of the line big TV > for the last couple months. I just couldn't believe the visual clarity > and for example half hour travel shows took an hour for me to view, > with constant pausing and backing up even on shows I had already seen > for sights I had seen in person. Could count the bristles of a > mustache or a pine tree. (BTW you should reset most tuning parameters > of big TV's, which are shamelessly tweaked to look good in a bright > flourescent showroom). > So I was viewing what was more vivid and interesting than "reality", > with stress relieving glasses. Then was prescribed the same sph for > "real life". What else could it be besides HDTV + undercorrection, > although wonder whats going on about the cyl degradation? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "dumbstruck" <dumbstruc[at]gmail.com> wrote - quote - > That is common? It certainly hasn't been for me, after a long life of
It's common in the sense that 25-50% of the nearsighted population gets this> backsliding or stable SPH. I AM being a little teasing about the > recent situation which I don't pretend to understand. pleasant little surprise at some time or other. Usually it's just one or two checkups where you see "improvement," then it levels off for several years. It's due to getting older, not to some exercises you might have done in the past. Since it happens to everybody, it happens to farsighted people too. It makes them "worse" and it makes eagle-eyed emmetropes wind up +0.50 or +0.75 farsighted, eventually. It starts about age 18. From that point on, mammals get less elastic. GUTIIBTA*. In the eyeball, a little of your shift in focal length is because the structure changes with age. But another part is neurological, changes in the reflexes and habits we use to control the structure, without conscious effort. This "reflex" component of myopia is the part you can modify with VT, and this "accommodative" part disappears as you age. - quote - > sudden death spiral of SPH that exactly coincided with intense
Frequently describing myopia that is exaggerated by excess accommodation, a> near point work over a couple years. commoncondition that guarantees a "miraculous improvement" in adulthood. - quote - > drop randomly or for some specific reason,
"Emergency VT" could be effective in accommodative myopia, but never> when it never has for me > before except in emergency VT? anatomical. - quote - > I hadn't honestly thought vision
Backsliding is religion. Vision therapy can't improve anatomical refractive> therapy would do much good for > someone whose vision had been stable > for a while vs. backsliding, but what else? errors. But Mother Nature cures all accommodative myopia if you live long enough. -MT, OD *Get Used To It It Beats The Alternative |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <a933ec95-95ed-4607-99c5-66a154a39f19[at]x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com> , dumbstruck <dumbstruc[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Oct 23, 3:36*am, "Mike Tyner" <mty...[at]mindspring.com> wrote:
How old are you?> > "dumbstruck" <dumbst...[at]gmail.com> wrote > > > > This really surprises and pleases me, and I thought I would speculate > > > on why it happened. I think it was accidental vision therapy > > > Why would you invent an imaginary process to explain such a common > > occurrance? > That is common? It certainly hasn't been for me, after a long life of > backsliding or stable SPH. I AM being a little teasing about the > recent situation which I don't pretend to understand. > But the earlier situation could only be attributed to vision therapy > with a high degree of certainty by any unbiased observer. There was a > sudden death spiral of SPH that exactly coincided with intense near > point work over a couple years. This was addressed with V.T. with > frequent eye exams where I have graphed the rebounding results, which > were able to persist during later nearpoint work. > I graph SPH and CYL over decades of many eye exams, and have never > seen SPH otherwise go down until now. Do you expect it to suddenly > drop randomly or for some specific reason, when it never has for me > before except in emergency VT? I hadn't honestly thought vision > therapy would do much good for someone whose vision had been stable > for a while vs. backsliding, but what else? -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA dabel[at]sonic.net |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Oct 23, 3:36*am, "Mike Tyner" <mty...[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > "dumbstruck" <dumbst...[at]gmail.com> wrote
That is common? It certainly hasn't been for me, after a long life of> > This really surprises and pleases me, and I thought I would speculate > > on why it happened. I think it was accidental vision therapy > Why would you invent an imaginary process to explain such a common > occurrance? backsliding or stable SPH. I AM being a little teasing about the recent situation which I don't pretend to understand. But the earlier situation could only be attributed to vision therapy with a high degree of certainty by any unbiased observer. There was a sudden death spiral of SPH that exactly coincided with intense near point work over a couple years. This was addressed with V.T. with frequent eye exams where I have graphed the rebounding results, which were able to persist during later nearpoint work. I graph SPH and CYL over decades of many eye exams, and have never seen SPH otherwise go down until now. Do you expect it to suddenly drop randomly or for some specific reason, when it never has for me before except in emergency VT? I hadn't honestly thought vision therapy would do much good for someone whose vision had been stable for a while vs. backsliding, but what else? |
| | |||
| |||
| "dumbstruck" <dumbstruc[at]gmail.com> wrote - quote - > This really surprises and pleases me, and I thought I would speculate
Why would you invent an imaginary process to explain such a common> on why it happened. I think it was accidental vision therapy occurrance? -MT |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I just had a .75 to 1.0 reduction in my nearsightedness prescribed (from around -2.5 to a smaller absolute number), and boy do the resulting glasses give me sharp vision. Partly due to being thinner, although they did have to increase the cyl by about half a diopter (boo). This really surprises and pleases me, and I thought I would speculate on why it happened. I think it was accidental vision therapy thru stress relieving lenses. I don't expect anyone to agree, because it was poorly received here when I recounted a much earlier reduction thru formal vision therapy, although that was more a reversal of a rapid freefall of nearsightedness. The only other explanation that comes to mind is PVDetachment stirring up the mix, which I hear can destabilize your prescription. But would it have similar effects to both eyes, in both sph and cyl? Would it result in me evolving to match the exact prescription of my reduced SPH "therapy" glasses?! To make this even more provocative, I propose the catalyst was a big high def TV, which I think congress should make medically tax deductable (grin). I watch with stress relieving glasses due to knowing from experience that less SPH is needed based on the distance (and more comfortable). I also knew if you undercorrect just a tad for any given distance, this seems to "tease" my eye muscles into relaxing which brings it into focus. This muscle spasm issue was diagnosed on me by an eyedoc, and may not be the root of other folks n.s. problems. However this was out of mind... I had seemed stable SPHwise for years and thought any improvement was just a part of history for me. I happened to start watching a really ultrasharp top of the line big TV for the last couple months. I just couldn't believe the visual clarity and for example half hour travel shows took an hour for me to view, with constant pausing and backing up even on shows I had already seen for sights I had seen in person. Could count the bristles of a mustache or a pine tree. (BTW you should reset most tuning parameters of big TV's, which are shamelessly tweaked to look good in a bright flourescent showroom). So I was viewing what was more vivid and interesting than "reality", with stress relieving glasses. Then was prescribed the same sph for "real life". What else could it be besides HDTV + undercorrection, although wonder whats going on about the cyl degradation? |
| Tags |
| big, prescribed, reduction, sph, yay |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| IOP reduction after a shot. Don W: When the eye receives a shot of Macugen, Avastin, or Lucentis, the IOP has a tendency to rise because of the volume of the injected drug. After... | Vision | 8 | 03-14-2007 07:35 PM | |
| Albinism and reduction of high definition receptiors Adrian Parker: Hi, I've been told that in the eye of a person with albinism, there are fewer rods to 'see' fine detail of an image. So even if all the other... | Vision | 11 | 07-10-2006 12:57 PM | |
| Myopia reduction proven - whats the next stage? andrewedwardjudd@hotmail.com: Having demonstrated amongst a small trial group that myopia reduction is possible via a psychotherapeutic/guidance method that looks at underlying... | Vision | 17 | 03-29-2005 10:55 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |