> In article
> <b3752aa4-4d25-4f6d-92e0-498f7c7b3...[at]e2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> ,
> mpac...[at]rogers.com wrote:
> > On Mar 26, 7:03 pm, Willy Sylers <willysyl...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mar 27, 12:32 am, mpac...[at]rogers.com wrote:
> > > > On Mar 25, 6:56 am, Willy Sylers <willysyl...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > What would happen if the power in one side of a
> > > > > spectacle is greater or lesser than the other,
> > > > > for example, you have myopia of -3.0 OD and
> > > > > -4.0 OS and you are wearing a spectacle that
> > > > > is -3.0 OD, -3.5 OS. You missed 0.5D or even
> > > > > 0.25D in one eye. Would the eye that sees
> > > > > clearer gets overwork and fatique?
> > > > The undercorrected eye would see a little bit blurry at distance.
> > > > That may or may not cause headache or discomfort. With a difference
> > > > as small as 0.50D, likely no effect.
> > > What Power Reserves (like Fusion Reserves) are involved in this?
> > Not sure what you mean by power reserves. Fusion reserves would not
> > be affected.
> > > Would the corrected eye or undercorrected eye gets more
> > > myopic?
> > Either or neither. Studies of this have had conflicting results.
> > Or let's go to a more neutral setting. Supposed a kid
> > > has a myopia of -0.5 in one eye and 0 in one eye. Would the
> > > eye with -0.5 myopia gets worse or the perfect eye becomes
> > > myopic?
> > It is not possible to predict this. Either or both could get worse,
> > Either or both could stay the same,
> I have my own question here. To read this group, you would think that
> 90% of the people in the world are myopic. A lot of the questions have
> to do with how something or other will affect myopia. If these things
> *do* have an effect on myopia, wouldn't they have a similar effect on
> hyperopia?
> --
> Dan Abel
> Petaluma, California USA
> da...[at]sonic.net- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -

> Dear Dan,
> Not in the "world", but the doctors themselves.
> Item:
> =============
> * * * * * *MYOPIA PREVALENCE IS ALWAYS HIGHER THAN 92 PERCENT
> * * * * * * * * * * *FOR TAIWAN MEDICAL STUDENTS
> o * Lin et al (Lin, L.K., Shih, Y.F., Lee, Y.C., Hung, P.T., and
> * * Hou, P.K., " Changes in ocular refraction and its components
> * * among medical students - a 5-year longitudinal study", Optom.
> * * Vis. *Sci., 73:495-498, 1996) found that in a study of 345
> * * National Taiwan University medical students, the myopia
> * * prevalence increased from 92.8% to 95.8% over the five year
> * * period.

> In article
> <b3752aa4-4d25-4f6d-92e0-498f7c7b3...[at]e2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> ,
> *mpac...[at]rogers.com wrote:
> > On Mar 26, 7:03*pm, Willy Sylers <willysyl...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mar 27, 12:32*am, mpac...[at]rogers.com wrote:
> > > > On Mar 25, 6:56*am, Willy Sylers <willysyl...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > What would happen if the power in one side of a
> > > > > spectacle is greater or lesser than the other,
> > > > > for example, you have myopia of -3.0 OD and
> > > > > -4.0 OS and you are wearing a spectacle that
> > > > > is -3.0 OD, -3.5 OS. You missed 0.5D or even
> > > > > 0.25D *in one eye. Would the eye that sees
> > > > > clearer gets overwork and fatique?
> > > > The undercorrected eye would see a little bit blurry at distance.
> > > > That may or may not cause headache or discomfort. *With a difference
> > > > as small as 0.50D, likely no effect.
> > > What Power Reserves (like Fusion Reserves) are involved in this?
> > Not sure what you mean by power reserves. *Fusion reserves would not
> > be affected.
> > > Would the corrected eye or undercorrected eye gets more
> > > myopic?
> > Either or neither. *Studies of this have had conflicting results.
> > Or let's go to a more neutral setting. Supposed a kid
> > > has a myopia of -0.5 in one eye and 0 in one eye. Would the
> > > eye with -0.5 myopia gets worse or the perfect eye becomes
> > > myopic?
> > It is not possible to predict this. *Either or both could get worse,
> > Either or both could stay the same,
> I have my own question here. *To read this group, you would think that
> 90% of the people in the world are myopic. *A lot of the questions have
> to do with how something or other will affect myopia. *If these things
> *do* have an effect on myopia, wouldn't they have a similar effect on
> hyperopia?
> --
> Dan Abel
> Petaluma, California USA
> da...[at]sonic.net- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -

> "Pia" <willysylers[at]gmail.com> wrote
> > So you are supporting Otis who is said to be the most
> > brilliant of eye exercise guru in the world.

> Gullible.

> > It is not possible to predict this. Either or both could get worse,
> > Either or both could stay the same,

> So you are supporting Otis who is said to be the most
> brilliant of eye exercise guru in the world.

> On Mar 26, 7:03*pm, Willy Sylers <willysyl...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 27, 12:32*am, mpac...[at]rogers.com wrote:
> > > > On Mar 25, 6:56*am, Willy Sylers <willysyl...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > What would happen if the power in one side of a
> > > > spectacle is greater or lesser than the other,
> > > > for example, you have myopia of -3.0 OD and
> > > > -4.0 OS and you are wearing a spectacle that
> > > > is -3.0 OD, -3.5 OS. You missed 0.5D or even
> > > > 0.25D *in one eye. Would the eye that sees
> > > > clearer gets overwork and fatique?
> > > > The undercorrected eye would see a little bit blurry at distance.
> > > That may or may not cause headache or discomfort. *With a difference
> > > as small as 0.50D, likely no effect.
> > > What Power Reserves (like Fusion Reserves) are involved in this?
> Not sure what you mean by power reserves. Fusion reserves would not
> be affected.
> > Would the corrected eye or undercorrected eye gets more
> > myopic?
> Either or neither. Studies of this have had conflicting results.
> Or let's go to a more neutral setting. Supposed a kid
> > has a myopia of -0.5 in one eye and 0 in one eye. Would the
> > eye with -0.5 myopia gets worse or the perfect eye becomes
> > myopic?
> It is not possible to predict this. Either or both could get worse,
> Either or both could stay the same,

> On Mar 26, 7:03*pm, Willy Sylers <willysyl...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 27, 12:32*am, mpac...[at]rogers.com wrote:
> > > On Mar 25, 6:56*am, Willy Sylers <willysyl...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > What would happen if the power in one side of a
> > > > spectacle is greater or lesser than the other,
> > > > for example, you have myopia of -3.0 OD and
> > > > -4.0 OS and you are wearing a spectacle that
> > > > is -3.0 OD, -3.5 OS. You missed 0.5D or even
> > > > 0.25D *in one eye. Would the eye that sees
> > > > clearer gets overwork and fatique?
> > > The undercorrected eye would see a little bit blurry at distance.
> > > That may or may not cause headache or discomfort. *With a difference
> > > as small as 0.50D, likely no effect.
> > What Power Reserves (like Fusion Reserves) are involved in this?
> Not sure what you mean by power reserves. *Fusion reserves would not
> be affected.

> > Would the corrected eye or undercorrected eye gets more
> > myopic?
> Either or neither. *Studies of this have had conflicting results.
> Or let's go to a more neutral setting. Supposed a kid
> > has a myopia of -0.5 in one eye and 0 in one eye. Would the
> > eye with -0.5 myopia gets worse or the perfect eye becomes
> > myopic?
> It is not possible to predict this. *Either or both could get worse,
> Either or both could stay the same,

> Judy- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -

> On Mar 27, 12:32*am, mpac...[at]rogers.com wrote:
> > On Mar 25, 6:56*am, Willy Sylers <willysyl...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > What would happen if the power in one side of a
> > > spectacle is greater or lesser than the other,
> > > for example, you have myopia of -3.0 OD and
> > > -4.0 OS and you are wearing a spectacle that
> > > is -3.0 OD, -3.5 OS. You missed 0.5D or even
> > > 0.25D *in one eye. Would the eye that sees
> > > clearer gets overwork and fatique?
> > The undercorrected eye would see a little bit blurry at distance.
> > That may or may not cause headache or discomfort. *With a difference
> > as small as 0.50D, likely no effect.
> What Power Reserves (like Fusion Reserves) are involved in this?

> Would the corrected eye or undercorrected eye gets more
> myopic?

> has a myopia of -0.5 in one eye and 0 in one eye. Would the
> eye with -0.5 myopia gets worse or the perfect eye becomes
> myopic?

> On Mar 25, 6:56*am, Willy Sylers <willysyl...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > What would happen if the power in one side of a
> > spectacle is greater or lesser than the other,
> > for example, you have myopia of -3.0 OD and
> > -4.0 OS and you are wearing a spectacle that
> > is -3.0 OD, -3.5 OS. You missed 0.5D or even
> > 0.25D *in one eye. Would the eye that sees
> > clearer gets overwork and fatique?
> The undercorrected eye would see a little bit blurry at distance.
> That may or may not cause headache or discomfort. *With a difference
> as small as 0.50D, likely no effect.

> > What's the tolerence or power allowance before one has to
> > change the glass?
> When it bothers you, with headache or discomfort with near or far
> tasks. *Some people are bothered by 0.50D difference, otheres are not
> bothered by a *2D or 3D difference.
> > Does this situation affec taccomodation or vengence of the eyes?
> No.
> > What's all the hidden effects of this situation?
> None.
> Dr Judy

> Hi,
> What would happen if the power in one side of a
> spectacle is greater or lesser than the other,
> for example, you have myopia of -3.0 OD and
> -4.0 OS and you are wearing a spectacle that
> is -3.0 OD, -3.5 OS. You missed 0.5D or even
> 0.25D *in one eye. Would the eye that sees
> clearer gets overwork and fatique?

> What's the tolerence or power allowance before one has to
> change the glass?

> Does this situation affec taccomodation or vengence of the eyes?

> What's all the hidden effects of this situation?