|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On 5 Feb 2004 11:54:42 -0800, rmorgan7[at]austin.rr.com (Ron M.) wrote: --Edited for brevity-- - quote - > About a month ago, I posted an article here describing a problem my
It's called a lensometer. I can make a lens that at some point on the lens reads> wife and i were having with new glasses we got from JC Penny optical. > Their lenses are made by US Vision. We got new prescriptions, and > BOTH of our glasses were just a little bit fuzzy, and we couldn't see > as well with them as with our old ones. Our optometrist double-checked > both the lenses and our vision, and the prescriptions were exactly > correct, and the lenses were ground exactly right as well, according > to that microscope-like device they use to check them with. exactly as prescribed and still causes blurring, double vision, pulling etc. - quote - > We had them remade: my wife's went from CR39 to Spectralite, and mine
You meant vice versa, right? That would make your lens aspheric if it's a FT28> changed from Spectralite to Seiko (I don't know which exact model). Spectralite. CR39 is easier to fit and grind, and might be the only solution if the labs equipment is not serviced regularly, and is operated by apprentices, with the lenses designed and fit by apprentice opticians. - quote - > My left lens came back perfect, too. Absolutely crisp. The right
Does the problem goes away when you look through your old glasses? Could you> lens, however, still had a problem; it was just a little fuzzy, just > enough to make it uncomfortable. Driving home with them, I'd be > looking at a license plate several car lengths ahead of me, and the > left side would be crisp and sharp, while the right side would be > slightly fuzzy, and I could barely read it, if at all. please post your old Rx? Thanks. - quote - > What's really happening here is that the right lens has a very slight
Another possibility that has not been discussed is the likelihood of a defect or> "double image." The faint 2nd image is slightly to the right of the > "main" image. The amount of overlap... looking at a light pole 250 > yards away, the two images overlap about 50%. wave in the lens at the OC. I've seen this happen with the best of labs. If your lens is aspheric there is more precision required in grinding and positioning the lens in front of the eye. Your eyewear supplier does not have a reputation for precision and quality IMHP, which leads me to strongly suspect the lens as the source of the problem. - quote - > Please... can somebody shed some light on this? I've been wearing
Ron,> glasses for 50 years, and I've never, never ever had an experience > like this. > Ron M. > Austin, Texas I would recommend a second opinion. A competent optician will be able to pinpoint the problem if it's due to errors in the lens and will most likely detect any errors in the Rx/refraction. If the error is in the design, fit, or fabrication of the lenses I would hope a refund would be forthcoming, especially after the fiasco you and your wife have endured. Hope this helps Robert Martellaro ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Optician/Owner Roberts Optical robopt[at]execpc.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself." - Richard Feynman |
| | |||
| |||
| |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Probably not, but I'll mention it. He is a superbly experienced
I consider myself a decent optometrist, but even I make a writing error once in> optometrist, one of the best anywhere. He re-tested my vision THREE > times, and got the EXACT same prescription every time. Wh awhile. A common one is to write "25" rather than "125" OR something like that. (which would make sense in your case: axis' of 125 and 88 make more sense than 25 and 88). Sometimes the Rx isn't totally readable either. Make sure the doctor checks the WRITTEN Rx you used against what's actually in the chart. It may correct in the chart (causing him to get the same thing every time) and incorrect in the written Rx. Or sometimes it can be written correct in one place on the chart, and incorrectly elsewhere. Its worth asking. Even the best make stupid mistakes like this (and the best will admit it.....) |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Ron, just a stab in the dark but I suspect the astigmatism axis may > be "off". Usually the axis for both eyes are in the same orientation > but yours are not. So my guess is that the astig axis is the culprit. > Ask your provider to re-check this. > frank Probably not, but I'll mention it. He is a superbly experienced optometrist, one of the best anywhere. He re-tested my vision THREE times, and got the EXACT same prescription every time. Whatever is going on here, it's happening in that right lens. Ron M. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| drfrank21 wrote: - quote - > Ron, just a stab in the dark but I suspect the astigmatism axis may
Really? I figured that god distributed axes randomly just to annoy us> be "off". Usually the axis for both eyes are in the same orientation with the biggest possible smears :-( R +3.50 -1.75x100 L +5.25 -1.75x80 -- Cheers, Bev =============================================== Last night I played a blank tape at full blast. The mime next door went nuts! |
| | |||
| |||
| rmorgan7[at]austin.rr.com (Ron M.) wrote in message news:<d7fc3008.0402051154.2fa0722b[at]posting.google.com> ... - quote - > You people here who are in this business, please give me some advice.
Ron, just a stab in the dark but I suspect the astigmatism axis may> I really have nobody to turn to. I know nothing about this field, so > let me just post what I know. > > Data point: I noticed that if I rotate the lens on a vertical axis - > looking down on it, rotating it clockwise - about 15-20 degrees, the > double image disappears! > That's it. That's all I know. And Penney's is balking at the idea of > a refund. I'm going to try to see my optometrist one more time, but > that's going to take a while because he's very well known. I'll be > lucky to see him in 3 weeks. > -------- > Here's my prescription, just the info off the prescription slip: > O.D. sphere -4.75 cylinder -50 axis 025 > O.S. sphere -4.25 cylinder -1.00 axis 088 > and over towards the right, it looks like it goes across both lines, > under "ADD" it says "+1.75 > Then P.D. is 66/63 > These are bifocals (regular bifocals, not lineless). > -------- be "off". Usually the axis for both eyes are in the same orientation but yours are not. So my guess is that the astig axis is the culprit. Ask your provider to re-check this. frank |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| You people here who are in this business, please give me some advice. I really have nobody to turn to. I know nothing about this field, so let me just post what I know. About a month ago, I posted an article here describing a problem my wife and i were having with new glasses we got from JC Penny optical. Their lenses are made by US Vision. We got new prescriptions, and BOTH of our glasses were just a little bit fuzzy, and we couldn't see as well with them as with our old ones. Our optometrist double-checked both the lenses and our vision, and the prescriptions were exactly correct, and the lenses were ground exactly right as well, according to that microscope-like device they use to check them with. We had them remade: my wife's went from CR39 to Spectralite, and mine changed from Spectralite to Seiko (I don't know which exact model). My wife's came back PERFECT. Razor sharp. My left lens came back perfect, too. Absolutely crisp. The right lens, however, still had a problem; it was just a little fuzzy, just enough to make it uncomfortable. Driving home with them, I'd be looking at a license plate several car lengths ahead of me, and the left side would be crisp and sharp, while the right side would be slightly fuzzy, and I could barely read it, if at all. What's really happening here is that the right lens has a very slight "double image." The faint 2nd image is slightly to the right of the "main" image. The amount of overlap... looking at a light pole 250 yards away, the two images overlap about 50%. They sent the right lens back to be remade a 2nd time. I got it today, and the optical shop manager said that the previous one had some "prism" that was causing the problem. I put it on, heart pounding. Nope, NOTHING had changed, it was exactly as before, a very faint double image, just enough to blur things a little. She said there was nothing else she could do. They'd remade them twice, the prescription was correct, they fixed the "prism," etc. and what I really needed to do was just wear them for a couple of days so my eyes could "adjust" to them. I'm quite leery of that advice, thank you. I don't think this will magically go away in 48 hours. Data point: I noticed that if I rotate the lens on a vertical axis - looking down on it, rotating it clockwise - about 15-20 degrees, the double image disappears! That's it. That's all I know. And Penney's is balking at the idea of a refund. I'm going to try to see my optometrist one more time, but that's going to take a while because he's very well known. I'll be lucky to see him in 3 weeks. -------- Here's my prescription, just the info off the prescription slip: O.D. sphere -4.75 cylinder -50 axis 025 O.S. sphere -4.25 cylinder -1.00 axis 088 and over towards the right, it looks like it goes across both lines, under "ADD" it says "+1.75 Then P.D. is 66/63 These are bifocals (regular bifocals, not lineless). -------- Please... can somebody shed some light on this? I've been wearing glasses for 50 years, and I've never, never ever had an experience like this. Ron M. Austin, Texas |
| Tags |
| advice, glasses, work |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| STILL can't get glasses to work! Any advice? Ron M.: You people here who are in this business, please give me some advice. I really have nobody to turn to. I know nothing about this field, so let me... | Main Category | 5 | 02-09-2004 10:43 PM | |
| I can't believe.. Francine Eisner: I can't believe how awful everyone is being to eachother. And it's not just here, it's happening on the groups I moderate, and the other groups I... | Vision | 9 | 12-23-2003 09:59 PM | |
| Computer / Everyday glasses advice needed. setamp: I normally wear RGP lenses but like to wear glasses from time to time for a week or so. My prescription is: O.D. -5.25, -.75, 55 O.S. -6.00,... | Main Category | 6 | 12-11-2003 01:03 AM | |
| Computer / Everyday glasses advice needed. setamp: I normally wear RGP lenses but like to wear glasses from time to time for a week or so. My prescription is: O.D. -5.25, -.75, 55 O.S. -6.00,... | Vision | 6 | 12-11-2003 01:03 AM | |
| can't see to read-suggestions? Jeffrey Gardner: 43 year old female (me) OK, here goes-bilateral schirmer of 0, all four puncta occluded (plugs, getting cautery soon). Distance prescription: O.D... | Main Category | 2 | 10-28-2003 01:42 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |